TP316 vs TP316L – Composition, Heat Treatment, Properties, and Applications
Share
Table Of Content
Table Of Content
Introduction
TP316 and TP316L are two closely related austenitic stainless steel grades widely specified in piping, pressure vessels, heat exchangers, and general fabrication. Engineers and procurement managers commonly face a selection dilemma: balancing corrosion resistance, weldability, and the need for post‑weld heat treatment against strength, cost, and availability. In many manufactured assemblies the decision reduces to whether the small reduction in carbon content (and its metallurgical consequences) in TP316L justifies any differences in mechanical performance or price.
The fundamental distinction between the two is the maximum carbon content: TP316L has a significantly lower carbon limit than TP316. This carbon control primarily affects susceptibility to chromium carbide precipitation (sensitization) during slow cooling from welding or solution‑annealing temperatures, and therefore strongly influences welding practice and post‑weld requirements. Because their chromium, nickel, and molybdenum levels are otherwise similar, TP316 and TP316L are otherwise comparable in corrosion resistance and general mechanical properties in the annealed condition.
1. Standards and Designations
Common standards and designations for these stainless steels include: - ASTM/ASME: TP316, TP316L under ASTM A240 / ASME SA-240 (plate, sheet) and related specifications for bars, tubes, and forgings. - EN: X5CrNiMo17-12-2 (≈ 316), X2CrNiMo17-12-2 (≈ 316L) under EN 10088 series. - JIS: SUS316 / SUS316L. - GB (China): 00Cr17Ni14Mo2 / 0Cr17Ni14Mo2 (approximate equivalents).
Classification: both TP316 and TP316L are austenitic stainless steels (stainless class). They are neither carbon steels nor HSLA/tool steels.
2. Chemical Composition and Alloying Strategy
The primary alloying strategy for the 316 family is to provide an austenitic matrix (via Ni), corrosion resistance (Cr and Mo), and controlled carbon to balance strength and sensitization risk.
Table: Typical composition ranges (wt%) — consult the specific standard or mill certificate for exact limits per product form.
| Element | TP316 (typical range) | TP316L (typical range) |
|---|---|---|
| C (carbon) | ≤ 0.08 | ≤ 0.03 (or ≤ 0.035 depending on spec) |
| Mn (manganese) | ≤ 2.0 | ≤ 2.0 |
| Si (silicon) | ≤ 1.0 | ≤ 1.0 |
| P (phosphorus) | ≤ 0.045 | ≤ 0.045 |
| S (sulfur) | ≤ 0.03 | ≤ 0.03 |
| Cr (chromium) | 16.0–18.0 | 16.0–18.0 |
| Ni (nickel) | 10.0–14.0 | 10.0–14.0 |
| Mo (molybdenum) | 2.0–3.0 | 2.0–3.0 |
| V (vanadium) | typically ≤ 0.1 | typically ≤ 0.1 |
| Nb (niobium) | generally ≤ 0.1 | generally ≤ 0.1 |
| Ti (titanium) | typically ≤ 0.1 | typically ≤ 0.1 |
| B (boron) | trace | trace |
| N (nitrogen) | ≤ 0.10 (varies) | ≤ 0.11 (varies) |
How alloying affects performance: - Chromium (Cr): provides general corrosion resistance and passivity. - Nickel (Ni): stabilizes austenite, improves toughness and ductility. - Molybdenum (Mo): increases resistance to pitting and crevice corrosion. - Carbon (C): increases strength modestly but promotes chromium carbide precipitation at grain boundaries if held in the sensitization range (roughly 450–850 °C), reducing intergranular corrosion resistance. - Minor elements (Mn, Si, N) influence deoxidation, strength, and austenite stability.
3. Microstructure and Heat Treatment Response
Microstructure: - Both TP316 and TP316L are essentially fully austenitic in the annealed condition. Grain structure is equiaxed austenite; small amounts of ferrite (δ‑ferrite) can be retained depending on composition and solidification mode—especially in castings and weld metal. - Carbide precipitation: carbon promotes formation of chromium carbides (Cr23C6) at grain boundaries during exposure to sensitization temperatures, which locally depletes chromium and enables intergranular attack.
Heat treatment and processing: - Solution anneal (typical): heat to $1010\text{–}1120\ ^\circ\text{C}$ (depending on spec) followed by rapid cooling, usually water quench, to re‑dissolve carbides and restore corrosion resistance. - Neither grade is strengthened by conventional heat treatment (they are not martensitic or precipitation‑hardenable); strength can be increased by cold working. - Thermo‑mechanical processing (rolling, cold work + anneal) controls grain size and can affect toughness; heavy cold work increases strength and reduces ductility. - For welded components: TP316L’s lower carbon reduces the driving force for carbide precipitation during slow cooling; TP316 may require solution anneal after heavy or extensive welding if service requires maximum intergranular corrosion resistance.
4. Mechanical Properties
Mechanical properties depend on product form (plate, sheet, pipe, bar), degree of cold work, and heat treatment. The table below gives typical annealed ranges representative for engineering selection. Always verify with the mill test certificate.
| Property (annealed) | TP316 (typical) | TP316L (typical) |
|---|---|---|
| Tensile strength (MPa) | ~480–620 | ~480–620 |
| Yield strength, 0.2% offset (MPa) | ~170–310 | ~140–290 |
| Elongation (A, %) | ≥ 40% (varies) | ≥ 40% (varies) |
| Impact toughness | Good—retains toughness at low temp (not specified by standard) | Good—similar to TP316 |
| Hardness (HB/HRB) | Annealed: typically ≤ 200 HV (≈ ≤ 95 HRB) | Annealed: typically ≤ 200 HV (≈ ≤ 95 HRB) |
Explanation: - Strength: nominal tensile strengths are similar because base alloying is similar; TP316 may show slightly higher yield due to higher carbon, but differences are modest in annealed condition. - Toughness and ductility: both are highly ductile and tough; TP316L can offer slightly better ductility and formability in some operations due to lower yield. - Hardness: both are soft in annealed state; cold working raises hardness and strength substantially.
5. Weldability
Austenitic 316 family stainless steels are among the most weldable stainless grades, but carbon content influences filler choice, preheat/postheat practice, and the need for post‑weld heat treatment.
Key welding considerations: - Sensitization risk: higher carbon increases the risk of chromium carbide precipitation in the heat‑affected zone (HAZ) during slow cooling. TP316L’s lower carbon greatly reduces this risk and is therefore preferred where extensive welding or post‑weld corrosion resistance is required. - Hot cracking: austenitic stainless steels benefit from some retained δ‑ferrite in weld metal to resist hot cracking. Composition and solidification mode determine resulting ferrite content. - Filler metals: matching or low‑carbon matching (e.g., ER316/ER316L) are typically used; for dissimilar joints use appropriate transition fillers (e.g., 309 for ferritic to austenitic joints).
Useful empirical indices (interpret qualitatively): - Carbon equivalent (IIW): $$CE_{IIW} = C + \frac{Mn}{6} + \frac{Cr + Mo + V}{5} + \frac{Ni + Cu}{15}$$ A higher $CE_{IIW}$ indicates increased hardenability and greater susceptibility to weld‑cold‑cracking in carbon steels; for austenitic stainless steels it can be used qualitatively to compare propensity to form undesirable microstructures during welding. - Pitting and welding cracking metric: $$P_{cm} = C + \frac{Si}{30} + \frac{Mn + Cu}{20} + \frac{Cr + Mo + V}{10} + \frac{Ni}{40} + \frac{Nb}{50} + \frac{Ti}{30} + \frac{B}{1000}$$ Higher $P_{cm}$ implies greater weldability challenges for stainless grades; lower carbon reduces $P_{cm}$.
Interpretation: - TP316L gives better assurance against sensitization without post‑weld solution annealing. In structures where post‑weld annealing is impractical (large tanks, field welding), TP316L is the safer choice. - TP316 can be used where welding is limited, post‑weld anneal is feasible, or where slightly higher strength/creep resistance at elevated temperature is required.
6. Corrosion and Surface Protection
316 family stainless steels rely on passive chromium oxide films for corrosion resistance. Molybdenum improves localized corrosion resistance (pitting, crevice corrosion).
Pitting resistance equivalent number (PREN) is sometimes used to compare localized corrosion resistance: $$\text{PREN} = \text{Cr} + 3.3 \times \text{Mo} + 16 \times \text{N}$$ For conventional 316/316L (moderate Cr, ~2–3% Mo, low N) PREN indicates moderate resistance to pitting compared to duplex or superaustenitic grades.
Notes: - Both TP316 and TP316L have similar bulk corrosion resistance because Cr, Ni, and Mo contents are similar; carbon does not directly change pitting resistance but indirectly affects corrosion performance by promoting sensitization and intergranular corrosion if carbides form. - Surface protection methods (galvanizing, painting) apply to non‑stainless steels; for stainless substrates passivation treatments (acid pickling, nitric passivation) are used to restore or enhance the passive film.
7. Fabrication, Machinability, and Formability
- Forming: Both grades have excellent formability in the annealed condition. TP316L’s slightly lower yield strength can make deep drawing and stamping marginally easier and reduce springback.
- Machinability: Austenitic stainless steels work‑harden rapidly and have poor machinability compared with carbon steels. Special tooling, rigid setups, and appropriate feeds/speeds are required. TP316 and TP316L machine similarly; small differences arise from cold‑working tendencies.
- Finishing: Electropolishing and mechanical polishing are common. TP316L benefits from reduced risk of sensitization during thermal exposure in fabrication.
- Cold forming increases strength significantly and reduces ductility; post‑forming solution annealing restores full corrosion resistance if sensitization was a concern.
8. Typical Applications
| TP316 (uses) | TP316L (uses) |
|---|---|
| Heat exchanger tubing where some higher strength/creep resistance at moderate elevated temperatures is required; pressure vessel components when post‑weld annealing is planned | Large welded tanks and vessels for chemical/pharmaceutical processing where minimization of post‑weld heat treatment is critical |
| Offshore and marine equipment with moderate corrosion exposure (where Mo provides pitting resistance) | Piping systems, fittings, and sanitary equipment where extensive field welding occurs |
| Fasteners, bolts, and parts that will be cold worked to increase strength | Cryogenic applications, pharmaceutical and medical devices where low carbon is preferred to avoid contamination and sensitization |
| Some chemical process equipment where fabrication includes limited welding | Food processing, brewing, and storage tanks with heavy welding requirements |
Selection rationale: - Choose TP316 where slightly higher strength or elevated‑temperature properties are required and where welds can be solution‑annealed or service conditions do not risk sensitization. - Choose TP316L where welding is extensive, post‑weld heat treatment is impractical, and maximum assurance against intergranular corrosion is required.
9. Cost and Availability
- Cost: In most markets TP316 and TP316L are priced similarly because base alloy additions (Ni, Mo) dominate cost; TP316L may carry a small premium in some product forms due to additional processing controls. Price is heavily affected by global nickel and molybdenum markets.
- Availability: Both grades are widely available in sheets, plates, pipes, tubes, bars, forgings, and welding consumables. TP316L is commonly stocked for piping and sanitary uses; TP316 is common in heat exchanger tubing and some pressure‑retaining components.
10. Summary and Recommendation
| Metric | TP316 | TP316L |
|---|---|---|
| Weldability (resistance to sensitization) | Good; requires caution for heavy welding | Better for heavy/field welding; low risk of sensitization |
| Strength–Toughness | Slightly higher yield in some conditions; similar tensile & toughness | Slightly lower yield; excellent toughness and ductility |
| Cost & availability | Comparable; may be marginally less in some markets | Comparable; widely stocked for welded fabrications |
Conclusions — practical guidance - Choose TP316L if: your design involves extensive welding or field welding, you cannot perform post‑weld solution annealing, or maximum protection against intergranular corrosion is required (e.g., pharmaceutical, food, chemical tanks, long welded piping runs). - Choose TP316 if: you need the marginally higher yield or creep strength available in some heats, you can apply controlled post‑weld heat treatment (solution anneal) when required, or if specification calls for TP316 for compatibility with existing components and fabrication practices.
Final note: Both grades are excellent general‑purpose stainless steels. Specify the exact standard, required corrosion performance, maximum allowable carbon (and whether stabilized variants like 316Ti or 316Cb are acceptable), and required post‑fabrication treatments on procurement documents. Always confirm mechanical and chemical data with the mill test certificate for the specific product form and heat lot in the order.