SUP7 vs SUP9 – Composition, Heat Treatment, Properties, and Applications
Share
Table Of Content
Table Of Content
Introduction
Engineers, procurement managers, and manufacturing planners frequently face the choice between closely related steel grades for structural, pressure-containing, or wear-exposed components. Typical decision contexts include balancing strength versus ductility, weldability versus hardenability, and lifecycle cost (material plus fabrication and protection) versus in-service performance.
SUP7 and SUP9 are adjacent grades in the same family and are commonly compared because they target similar application spaces but with different alloying and processing emphases. The primary practical difference is that SUP9 is positioned as the higher-performance (upgraded) member of the pair—designed to deliver increased strength and hardenability through additional alloying or processing options—whereas SUP7 emphasizes baseline performance with better inherent fabricability and lower cost. That directional relationship explains why designers evaluate both grades when choosing material for parts that may require an optimized trade-off between mechanical performance and manufacturability.
1. Standards and Designations
- Common referenced systems: JIS (Japanese Industrial Standards), GB (Chinese National Standards), EN (European), and ASTM/ASME (American). The SUP series naming convention is frequently seen in East Asian standards and supplier catalogs.
- Material category: Both SUP7 and SUP9 are non-stainless, low-alloy/microalloy carbon steels (not tool steels or stainless). They are typically engineered for structural and pressure applications and may be supplied in normalized, quenched & tempered, or thermomechanically rolled conditions depending on the supplier and end use.
2. Chemical Composition and Alloying Strategy
The SUP7–SUP9 pair is differentiated primarily by incremental alloying and microalloy additions intended to alter strength, hardenability, and toughness. The table below uses qualitative descriptors (Present/Trace/Not typical) to avoid misrepresenting specific mass fractions; actual compositions should be obtained from the applicable standard or supplier datasheet for design or procurement.
| Element | SUP7 (typical role) | SUP9 (typical role) |
|---|---|---|
| C (Carbon) | Low to moderate; baseline strengthening and hardenability | Moderate; slightly higher to support higher strength/hardenability |
| Mn (Manganese) | Present; deoxidation, strength, toughness | Present; often similar or slightly higher to aid hardenability |
| Si (Silicon) | Present in small amounts for deoxidation | Present in small amounts |
| P (Phosphorus) | Controlled impurity (kept low) | Controlled impurity (kept low) |
| S (Sulfur) | Controlled; may be present in low ppm | Controlled; kept low for mechanical properties |
| Cr (Chromium) | May be present in trace/low amounts for strength/hardening | Often present at higher levels than SUP7 to increase hardenability and tempering resistance |
| Ni (Nickel) | Not dominant; trace or absent in many variants | May be present in some SUP9 variants for toughness improvement |
| Mo (Molybdenum) | Typically not a primary addition; trace in some variants | Frequently used in SUP9 to improve hardenability and high-temperature strength |
| V (Vanadium) | Microalloying (trace) possible for grain refinement | Microalloying more likely or at slightly higher levels to refine grain and raise strength |
| Nb (Niobium) | Trace microalloying possible | May be present in SUP9 microalloy variants |
| Ti (Titanium) | Trace as stabilizer in some steels | Trace in some variants |
| B (Boron) | Not typical, but can be used in trace amounts in higher-hardening variants | Trace boron possible in SUP9 variants to enhance hardenability |
| N (Nitrogen) | Controlled; affects nitride formation and toughness | Controlled; compositional control important for toughness and microalloy precipitation |
How alloying affects key attributes: - Strength and tempering resistance: Elements such as Cr, Mo, Ni, V, and Nb increase strength and elevated-temperature tempering resistance. SUP9 commonly has more of these contributors. - Hardenability: Cr, Mo, and small additions like B raise hardenability, enabling thicker sections to achieve higher quench hardness. SUP9 is typically engineered for higher hardenability. - Toughness and grain control: Microalloying elements (V, Nb, Ti) and tighter composition control allow finer ferrite/pearlite or tempered martensite microstructures for improved toughness. - Corrosion resistance: Neither grade is stainless; corrosion performance depends on coatings and environment rather than inherent alloying (except for Cr/Ni additions that marginally help).
3. Microstructure and Heat Treatment Response
Typical as-delivered microstructures: - SUP7: Often delivered normalized or normalized and tempered; microstructure tends toward ferrite–pearlite or tempered bainite/martensite depending on carbon content and heat treatment. - SUP9: Designed to achieve higher fractions of bainite or tempered martensite after quench & temper; also available in thermomechanically controlled rolled conditions to achieve fine-grained bainitic structures.
Effect of processing: - Normalizing: Both grades refine grain size and homogenize structure; normalizing improves toughness and uniformity but gives lower strength than quench & temper. - Quenching & tempering: SUP9 benefits more from Q&T because its alloying increases hardenability and temper resistance, enabling higher tempered strength for a given quench severity. SUP7 can be Q&T but is typically limited to lower tempering ranges to balance toughness. - Thermo-mechanical processing (TMCP): When applied, TMCP can produce fine-grained microstructures in both grades; SUP9 variants can be optimized to produce strong, tough microstructures without requiring extreme heat treatments.
Microstructural consequences: - Increased alloying and microalloy additions in SUP9 promote harder, stronger phases (tempered martensite or bainite) at practical section thicknesses, while SUP7 tends toward more ductile ferrite–pearlite unless heavily heat-treated.
4. Mechanical Properties
Because composition and processing affect properties strongly, the following table provides qualitative comparative descriptors rather than absolute numbers. For design, use supplier or standard-certified test data.
| Property | SUP7 | SUP9 |
|---|---|---|
| Tensile strength | Moderate | Higher (designed for increased tensile strength) |
| Yield strength | Moderate | Higher (elevated yield due to alloying/microalloys) |
| Elongation (ductility) | Higher (more ductile in equivalent condition) | Lower relative to SUP7 at equivalent strength level, but acceptable when tempered properly |
| Impact toughness | Good, especially when normalized | Comparable or better if properly heat treated; may require TMCP/Q&T to achieve similar low-temperature toughness |
| Hardness | Lower to moderate | Higher capability after Q&T; greater as-quenched hardness potential |
Interpretation: SUP9 is engineered to provide higher strength and hardenability; however, achieving high strength typically reduces ductility unless mitigation via controlled microstructure (TMCP, microalloying) is applied. SUP7 favors fabricability and ductility in baseline conditions.
5. Weldability
Weldability depends on carbon equivalent and presence of hardening alloying. Useful predictive formulas (no numeric substitution here) include:
$$CE_{IIW} = C + \frac{Mn}{6} + \frac{Cr+Mo+V}{5} + \frac{Ni+Cu}{15}$$
and
$$P_{cm} = C + \frac{Si}{30} + \frac{Mn+Cu}{20} + \frac{Cr+Mo+V}{10} + \frac{Ni}{40} + \frac{Nb}{50} + \frac{Ti}{30} + \frac{B}{1000}$$
Qualitative interpretation: - SUP7: Lower carbon and simpler alloying typically result in lower $CE_{IIW}$ and $P_{cm}$ values, indicating easier weldability with lower preheat and lower cracking susceptibility. - SUP9: Additional Cr, Mo, and microalloying raise hardenability and therefore tend to increase $CE_{IIW}$ and $P_{cm}$; this raises the risk of martensite formation in the HAZ and increases susceptibility to cold cracking unless proper preheat/post-weld heat treatment (PWHT), controlled interpass temperatures, and consumable matching are used. - Practical guidance: For SUP9, expect to plan for controlled welding procedures (preheat, interpass temperature controls, and possibly PWHT) for thicker sections or highly restrained joints. For SUP7, standard welding practice is often sufficient for many applications.
6. Corrosion and Surface Protection
- Neither SUP7 nor SUP9 is stainless. Their corrosion resistance in atmospheric or aqueous environments is similar and primarily controlled by surface protection and environment.
- Typical protective measures: hot-dip galvanizing, electroplating, organic coatings (paints, epoxy), metallizing, or cathodic protection for buried/immersed applications.
- Stainless-type indices such as PREN do not apply to these low-alloy carbon steels; the PREN formula is relevant only for stainless alloys:
$$\text{PREN} = \text{Cr} + 3.3 \times \text{Mo} + 16 \times \text{N}$$
- Small amounts of Cr/Ni/Mo in SUP9 variants marginally improve resistance to localized corrosion compared to SUP7, but neither grade should be selected for corrosion resistance where stainless steels are required.
7. Fabrication, Machinability, and Formability
- Machinability: Lower-strength, lower-hardness conditions of SUP7 are generally easier to machine and produce lower tool wear. SUP9 in a higher-strength or tempered state may reduce machinability and increase cutting forces and tool life concerns.
- Formability and bending: SUP7 offers better formability and bendability in equivalent metallurgical conditions. SUP9, when specified for higher strength, may require increased bend radii, lower strain during forming, or intermediate annealing steps to avoid cracking.
- Surface finishing: Both grades respond well to common finishing operations (shot blasting, grinding, machining). Grinding/hard machining of SUP9 in high-strength condition will generate higher temperatures and wear.
- Fabrication planning: Choose forming and machining allowances based on the temper condition; for SUP9, consider specifying normalized or tempered conditions that optimize the balance between as-delivered strength and fabrication practicality.
8. Typical Applications
| SUP7 — Typical Uses | SUP9 — Typical Uses |
|---|---|
| General structural components where standard strength and good weldability/formability are required (beams, brackets, plates) | Heavier-duty structural members and components requiring higher strength or better hardenability (thicker sections, shafts, pressure parts) |
| Fabricated assemblies where cost and ease of fabrication are priorities | Components subject to higher loads, fatigue, or wear where increased strength is needed |
| Line pipe or pressure applications where moderate strength and high ductility are required (depending on spec) | Parts designed for quench & temper or TMCP to achieve higher strength for the same geometry |
Selection rationale: - Choose SUP7 when fabrication efficiency, lower cost, and ductility are priorities and when strength requirements are moderate. - Choose SUP9 when design calls for higher strength and/or enhanced through-thickness hardenability, and when appropriate welding and heat-treatment practices can be applied.
9. Cost and Availability
- Relative cost: SUP7 is typically the lower-cost option due to simpler alloying and wider availability in standard forms. SUP9, with additional alloying and processing options (Q&T, TMCP), tends to be more expensive.
- Availability by product form: SUP7 is usually widely available in plate, sheet, and standard bar sizes. SUP9 availability depends on market and mill capabilities; specialized quenched & tempered or microalloyed variants may be available by order and in select product ranges.
- Procurement considerations: Factor in not just material cost but also fabrication, heat treatment, welding procedure qualification, and inspection when comparing lifecycle cost between the grades.
10. Summary and Recommendation
Summary table (qualitative):
| Attribute | SUP7 | SUP9 |
|---|---|---|
| Weldability | Better (lower CE/Pcm) | Requires more control (higher CE/Pcm potential) |
| Strength–Toughness balance | Good ductility at moderate strength | Higher strength potential; toughness depends on processing |
| Cost | Lower (material and typical processing) | Higher (alloying and heat treatment costs) |
Recommendation: - Choose SUP7 if: you need a cost-effective, easily fabricated steel with good ductility and acceptable strength for general structural or pressure applications where extreme hardenability or elevated strength is not required. - Choose SUP9 if: your design requires higher tensile or yield strength, improved hardenability for thicker sections, or elevated tempering resistance, and you can accommodate stricter welding controls, potential PWHT, and a slightly higher material cost.
Final note: SUP7 and SUP9 cover a family of product variants and processing routes. Always consult the relevant standard, mill certificate, and supplier datasheet for exact chemical composition, certified mechanical test results, and recommended welding/heat-treatment practices before final material selection or qualification.