309 vs 310S – Composition, Heat Treatment, Properties, and Applications
Share
Table Of Content
Table Of Content
Introduction
Grades 309 and 310S are austenitic stainless steels widely used where elevated-temperature strength and oxidation resistance are required. Engineers and procurement professionals commonly weigh trade-offs between high-temperature corrosion resistance, weldability, and material cost when choosing between them. Typical decision contexts include furnace components, heat-treatment fixtures, high-temperature ducts, and chemical process equipment where temperature, cyclic heating, and weld integrity drive the selection.
The primary technical distinction between these two grades is alloy balance: 310S is engineered with substantially higher chromium and nickel and lower carbon than 309, which improves hot corrosion and reduces sensitization risk; 309 contains less nickel and relatively higher carbon (in the standard grade) making it more economical but slightly more sensitive to carbide precipitation under some thermal cycles. Because they overlap in application space, designers compare them mainly on high-temperature oxidation performance, weldability (sensitization risk), and cost.
1. Standards and Designations
- Common specifications and designations:
- ASTM/ASME: A240 / SA240 (heat-resisting stainless steels)
- EN: EN 10088 family (various national and pan-European designations)
- JIS/GB: Japanese and Chinese equivalents for heat-resistant stainless steels
- UNS: UNS S30900 (309), UNS S31008 (310S)
- Material classification:
- Both 309 and 310S are austenitic stainless steels (stainless category).
- They are not carbon steels, tool steels, or HSLA. They are alloyed stainless steels designed for high-temperature service.
2. Chemical Composition and Alloying Strategy
The following table shows the key alloying elements that define the metallurgical behavior of 309 versus 310S. Values are presented qualitatively as typical ranges and relative differences rather than single-point, certified mill values — always confirm with the mill certificate for procurement.
| Element | 309 (typical ranges / notes) | 310S (typical ranges / notes) |
|---|---|---|
| C (carbon) | Moderate (standard 309 has higher C limit than ‘S’ versions) | Low carbon (max C substantially reduced; limits carbide precipitation) |
| Mn (manganese) | Up to moderate (improves hot strength; common up to ~2%) | Similar to 309 (comparable Mn allowance) |
| Si (silicon) | Small additions for oxidation resistance (silicon up to ~1%) | Similar small Si for oxidation resistance |
| P (phosphorus) | Kept low (impurity control) | Kept low |
| S (sulfur) | Kept low (improves formability of free-machining grades only) | Kept low |
| Cr (chromium) | High (good oxidation resistance; lower than 310S) | Higher (best among the two; improves high-temperature oxidation and corrosion resistance) |
| Ni (nickel) | Elevated (but lower than 310S) | Elevated and higher than 309 (stabilizes austenite, improves ductility and high-temp creep resistance) |
| Mo (molybdenum) | Generally not present in significant amounts | Generally not present (limits pitting resistance improvements) |
| V, Nb, Ti, B | Not primary alloying elements in either; may appear in trace or stabilization variants | Nb/Ti seldom used in these grades; 310S is low-carbon rather than stabilized |
| N (nitrogen) | Low to very low | Low to very low |
How alloying affects properties: - Chromium increases oxidation resistance and forms a protective oxide scale at high temperature. - Nickel stabilizes the austenitic phase, enhances ductility and high-temperature strength, and improves resistance to cyclic thermal stresses. - Carbon increases strength but enables carbide precipitation (sensitization) on slow cooling through 450–850°C; low-carbon “S” grades reduce that risk. - Molybdenum improves pitting resistance but is typically not present in 309/310S.
3. Microstructure and Heat Treatment Response
- Microstructure:
- Both 309 and 310S are fully austenitic in the annealed condition. The microstructure consists of face-centered cubic (FCC) austenite with potential carbide precipitates or sigma phase under certain thermal exposures.
- Heat treatment response:
- Austenitic stainless steels are not hardenable by quench-and-temper strategies used for ferritic/martensitic steels. Strength adjustments rely on cold work, solution annealing, recrystallization, and strain hardening.
- Solution annealing (typical industry practice) restores ductility and dissolves precipitates; common solution-anneal temperatures fall in the general range used for austenitic heat-resistant alloys (consult product/standard for exact temperatures).
- Sensitization: Higher carbon in standard 309 can lead to chromium carbide precipitation at grain boundaries if exposed to 450–850°C; 310S (low carbon) reduces this risk, so it is preferred where post-weld annealing is not feasible or where service cycles pass repeatedly through the sensitization range.
- Sigma phase and other intermetallics: Long exposures between approximately 600–900°C can promote sigma phase formation in chromium-rich alloys, which embrittles the material; the composition and thermal history influence susceptibility.
4. Mechanical Properties
Mechanical properties vary with product form (sheet, plate, bar) and cold-working condition. Rather than single absolute numbers, users should rely on mill certificates. Below is a comparative qualitative table for typical annealed conditions.
| Property | 309 (annealed) | 310S (annealed) |
|---|---|---|
| Tensile strength | Comparable to austenitic stainless steels; slightly lower than 310S in some cases | Similar or marginally higher due to higher Ni content improving high-temperature strength |
| Yield strength | Similar; both have relatively low yield compared with ferritic/martensitic steels | Similar; 310S may retain strength slightly better at high temperatures |
| Elongation (ductility) | High ductility typical of austenitic stainless steels | High ductility; nickel content helps maintain ductility at elevated temperature |
| Impact toughness | Good toughness at ambient temperature; not notch-sensitive like martensitic steels | Good toughness; low carbon reduces embrittlement risk after welding |
| Hardness | Low hardness in annealed state (soft, ductile) | Low hardness in annealed state |
Interpretation: - Neither grade is used primarily for high static strength at ambient temperature; they are selected for high-temperature performance and corrosion/oxidation behavior. - 310S typically provides slightly better strength retention and oxidation resistance at elevated temperatures due to its higher Cr and Ni content; 309 is a compromise between cost and elevated-temperature capability.
5. Weldability
Weldability of austenitic stainless steels is generally excellent in terms of avoiding hard, brittle phases, but attention is needed for sensitization, distortion, and hot cracking.
Useful indices: - Carbon equivalent (IIW form) to compare hardenability tendencies (qualitative for stainless alloys): $$CE_{IIW} = C + \frac{Mn}{6} + \frac{Cr+Mo+V}{5} + \frac{Ni+Cu}{15}$$ - Pcm for evaluating cold-cracking and weldability tendency: $$P_{cm} = C + \frac{Si}{30} + \frac{Mn+Cu}{20} + \frac{Cr+Mo+V}{10} + \frac{Ni}{40} + \frac{Nb}{50} + \frac{Ti}{30} + \frac{B}{1000}$$
Qualitative interpretation: - 310S has lower carbon, which reduces the risk of intergranular corrosion (sensitization) after welding and minimizes carbide precipitation — improving post-weld corrosion performance. - Higher nickel in 310S stabilizes austenite and reduces the tendency toward hot cracking; 309's lower nickel content makes it marginally more prone to weld-related issues under certain conditions but still generally weldable with standard austenitic filler metals. - Preheat and interpass temperatures are typically not required for these austenitic grades; however, restraint, joint design, and post-weld heat treatment choices should consider sigma-phase precipitation risk if parts will see long exposures in the 600–900°C range.
6. Corrosion and Surface Protection
- General corrosion and high-temperature oxidation:
- Both grades rely on chromium to develop a protective oxide layer. 310S, with higher chromium and nickel, normally offers superior high-temperature oxidation resistance compared with 309.
- Pitting and crevice corrosion:
- Neither 309 nor 310S contains significant molybdenum; therefore, they have limited resistance to chloride-induced pitting relative to Mo-bearing grades. Use of PREN for pitting propensity (where Mo is significant) is shown as: $$\text{PREN} = \text{Cr} + 3.3 \times \text{Mo} + 16 \times \text{N}$$
- In 309/310S application, PREN is of limited usefulness because Mo is typically absent and N is low; pitting resistance is therefore modest.
- Surface protection for non-stainless steels:
- Not applicable — both are stainless grades. For components where local surface damage or severe chloride environments are expected, consider Mo-bearing grades or protective coatings.
- When to favor 310S over 309:
- For sustained high-temperature oxidation, carburizing atmospheres, and cyclic thermal exposure, 310S is preferred due to its superior scale adherence and higher alloy content.
7. Fabrication, Machinability, and Formability
- Formability and bending:
- Both are readily formed in the annealed condition; they have excellent ductility. Higher nickel in 310S gives slightly better formability at elevated temperatures and better resistance to work hardening during forming.
- Machinability:
- Austenitic stainless steels are generally "gummy" and work-harden during cutting; machinability is lower than for carbon steels. 309 and 310S are similar in machinability, with 310S sometimes being a bit more challenging due to higher alloy content and toughness.
- Surface finishing:
- Both take common stainless finishes (polishing, grinding, bead blasting) well, but hardness of used tooling and cutting parameters must be adapted to avoid work hardening and build-up on tool edges.
8. Typical Applications
| 309 — Typical Uses | 310S — Typical Uses |
|---|---|
| Furnace muffles, heat-treatment fixtures where oxidation resistance is required at moderate cost | High-temperature furnace components, muffles, and retorts requiring superior oxidation resistance and cyclic stability |
| Heat-exchanger parts in less-severe high-temperature air environments | Components exposed to stronger oxidizing atmospheres, radiant tubes, basket liners for heat treatment |
| Industrial ovens, kiln liners where cost matters and extreme service is limited | Applications with prolonged exposure to 900–1100°C or cyclic high-temperature service where reduced sensitization is critical |
Selection rationale: - Choose 309 where elevated-temperature oxidation resistance is needed but budget constraints and lower nickel content are important. - Choose 310S where maximum high-temperature oxidation resistance, creep resistance at elevated temperature, and lower carbon to avoid sensitization outweigh material cost.
9. Cost and Availability
- Relative cost:
- 310S typically commands a higher price than 309 because of its higher nickel and chromium content.
- 309 is commonly offered as a cost-effective high-temperature stainless option.
- Availability by product form:
- Both grades are widely available in sheet, plate, tube, and bar forms from multiple mills. Availability can vary regionally and by product size; procurement should confirm lead times for the required form and finish.
- Stock forms:
- Standard product forms (cold-rolled sheet, hot-rolled plate, welded tubing) are common; specialized sizes or heavy sections may have longer lead times.
10. Summary and Recommendation
Summary table (qualitative)
| Attribute | 309 | 310S |
|---|---|---|
| Weldability | Good; slightly more sensitization risk in standard 309 vs 310S | Very good; low carbon reduces sensitization risk |
| Strength–Toughness (High temp) | Good for many elevated-temperature uses; lower than 310S at very high T | Superior high-temperature strength retention and ductility |
| Cost | Lower (more economical) | Higher (premium due to Ni/Cr content) |
Recommendation (practical guidance) - Choose 309 if: - Your application requires good elevated-temperature oxidation resistance but budget is constrained. - Service temperatures are moderate for heat-resistant steels and the design allows for post-weld treatments or limited exposure in the sensitization range. - You need a cost-effective solution for furnace baskets, oven components, or ducts where extreme cyclic thermal stability is not critical. - Choose 310S if: - You require superior high-temperature oxidation resistance, longer life under cyclic thermal loads, or better creep resistance at elevated temperatures. - Welding without post-weld anneal is necessary and minimizing the risk of sensitization is important. - The application involves more aggressive oxidizing atmospheres or sustained operation near the upper temperature capability of these alloys.
Final note: Performance and economics depend on exact composition, material form, and service conditions. Always verify mill certificates and perform engineering validation (laboratory testing, weld procedure qualification, or finite-element thermal analysis) when selecting between 309 and 310S for critical applications.