Steel Compare

316 vs 317 – Composition, Heat Treatment, Prope...

Introduction Engineers, procurement managers, and manufacturing planners frequently face the choice between 316 and 317 stainless steels when specifying components for corrosive environments. The selection dilemma typically balances corrosion resistance...

201 vs 202 – Composition, Heat Treatment, Prope...

Introduction Choosing between stainless-steel grades 201 and 202 is a recurring procurement and design decision for engineers, manufacturing planners, and procurement managers. Typical trade-offs are cost versus corrosion resistance, formability...

201 vs 304 – Composition, Heat Treatment, Prope...

Introduction Austenitic stainless steels 201 and 304 are among the most commonly considered grades when designers, procurement teams, and fabricators balance corrosion resistance, formability, mechanical performance, and cost. The typical...

304 vs 430 – Composition, Heat Treatment, Prope...

Introduction When engineers, procurement managers, and manufacturing planners select between stainless steel grades 304 and 430 they typically balance corrosion resistance, mechanical behavior, magnetic response, and cost. Common decision contexts...

304 vs 321 – Composition, Heat Treatment, Prope...

Introduction Stainless steels 304 and 321 are two of the most widely specified austenitic grades in industry. Engineers, procurement managers, and manufacturing planners commonly weigh corrosion resistance, high‑temperature stability, weldability,...

304 vs 316Ti – Composition, Heat Treatment, Pro...

Introduction Austenitic stainless steels 304 and 316Ti are two of the most frequently specified alloys in process equipment, piping, architecture, and fabricated components. Engineers and procurement professionals commonly weigh trade-offs...

316 vs 316L – Composition, Heat Treatment, Prop...

Introduction Type 316 and 316L austenitic stainless steels are two of the most widely specified grades in industry, from piping and pressure vessels to chemical-processing equipment and food-contact surfaces. Engineers,...

304 vs 304L – Composition, Heat Treatment, Prop...

Introduction Type 304 and its low‑carbon variant 304L are the two most widely specified austenitic stainless steels in industry. Engineers, procurement managers, and manufacturing planners routinely weigh corrosion resistance, mechanical...

304 vs 316 – Composition, Heat Treatment, Prope...

Introduction Stainless steels 304 and 316 are two of the most widely specified austenitic grades in industry. Engineers, procurement managers, and manufacturing planners frequently must decide between them when balancing...

304L vs 304H – Composition, Heat Treatment, Pro...

Introduction Type 304 variants are among the most widely used austenitic stainless steels in industry. Engineers, procurement managers, and manufacturing planners frequently need to decide between low-carbon 304L and higher-carbon...

304 vs 305 – Composition, Heat Treatment, Prope...

Introduction Grades 304 and 305 are both austenitic stainless steels widely used across processing, appliance, architectural, and industrial applications. Engineers and procurement teams commonly weigh corrosion resistance, formability, weldability, and...

304 vs 309S – Composition, Heat Treatment, Prop...

Introduction Selecting between 304 and 309S austenitic stainless steels is a frequent engineering trade-off that balances corrosion resistance, high-temperature performance, weldability, and cost. Procurement and manufacturing teams commonly choose 304...

310S vs 321 – Composition, Heat Treatment, Prop...

Introduction Engineers, procurement managers, and manufacturing planners commonly face a choice between 310S and 321 stainless steels when specifying parts that must balance high-temperature performance, corrosion resistance, weldability, and cost....

316 vs 310S – Composition, Heat Treatment, Prop...

Introduction Engineers, procurement managers, and manufacturing planners frequently face the choice between 316 and 310S stainless steels when specifying parts for corrosive or elevated-temperature environments. The decision typically balances corrosion...

304 vs 2205 – Composition, Heat Treatment, Prop...

Introduction Engineers, procurement managers, and manufacturing planners commonly face the trade-off between corrosion resistance, mechanical performance, and cost when selecting stainless steels for process equipment, piping, and structural components. Grade...

2205 vs 2507 – Composition, Heat Treatment, Pro...

Introduction Duplex stainless steels 2205 and 2507 (commonly called “super duplex”) are widely specified where higher strength and improved corrosion resistance are required compared with austenitic grades. Engineers and procurement...

904L vs 316L – Composition, Heat Treatment, Pro...

Introduction 904L and 316L are two widely used austenitic stainless steels that frequently compete in material selection for chemical, marine, and pharmaceutical process equipment. Engineers and procurement managers often weigh...

430 vs 304L – Composition, Heat Treatment, Prop...

Introduction 430 and 304L are two widely used stainless-steel grades that sit on different points of the cost–performance spectrum. 430 is a ferritic stainless steel often selected for cost-sensitive, decorative,...

316L vs 316Ti – Composition, Heat Treatment, Pr...

Introduction 316L and 316Ti are two widely used austenitic stainless steels derived from the 316 family. Engineers, procurement managers, and manufacturing planners commonly weigh corrosion resistance, weldability, and cost when...

304 vs 202 – Composition, Heat Treatment, Prope...

Introduction Stainless steels 304 and 202 are common austenitic grades used across fabrication, architectural, food processing, and consumer-product markets. Engineers, procurement managers, and manufacturing planners frequently decide between them when...

430 vs 446 – Composition, Heat Treatment, Prope...

Introduction Selecting between stainless steel grades 430 and 446 is a common decision point for engineers, procurement managers, and manufacturing planners who must balance corrosion resistance, high-temperature stability, manufacturability, and...

420 vs 440C – Composition, Heat Treatment, Prop...

Introduction 420 and 440C are two widely used martensitic stainless steels that appear frequently in procurement lists for parts requiring a balance of hardness, wear resistance, and corrosion performance. Engineers,...

410 vs 420 – Composition, Heat Treatment, Prope...

Introduction 410 and 420 are two widely used martensitic stainless steels that are often compared when designers must balance hardness and wear resistance against toughness, weldability, and cost. Procurement managers,...

301 vs 304 – Composition, Heat Treatment, Prope...

Introduction Engineers, procurement managers, and manufacturing planners often face the choice between two very common austenitic stainless steels: 301 and 304. The decision typically revolves around trade-offs between cost, corrosion...

444 vs 441 – Composition, Heat Treatment, Prope...

Introduction Selecting between stainless steel grades 444 and 441 is a common dilemma for engineers, procurement managers, and manufacturing planners working in corrosive environments, high-temperature systems, and automotive exhaust applications....

409 vs 430 – Composition, Heat Treatment, Prope...

Introduction Choosing between 409 and 430 stainless steels is a common decision point for engineers, procurement managers, and manufacturing planners, particularly when balancing corrosion resistance, cost, formability, and weldability. Typical...

310S vs 309 – Composition, Heat Treatment, Prop...

Introduction Engineers, procurement managers, and manufacturing planners commonly face a trade-off when specifying high-temperature stainless steels: corrosion resistance, high-temperature strength and creep resistance, weldability, and material cost. Grades 310S and...

321 vs 347 – Composition, Heat Treatment, Prope...

Introduction Type 321 and Type 347 are two commonly specified stabilized austenitic stainless steels used where the combination of corrosion resistance, weldability, and elevated-temperature stability is required. Engineers, procurement managers,...

316L vs 904L – Composition, Heat Treatment, Pro...

Introduction Selecting between 316L and 904L is a common materials decision for engineers, procurement managers, and manufacturing planners who must balance corrosion performance, fabrication cost, and service requirements. Typical decision...

Q355 vs Q390 – Composition, Heat Treatment, Pro...

Introduction Q355 and Q390 are high-strength structural steels widely used in construction, heavy equipment, and general fabrication. Engineers, procurement managers, and manufacturing planners frequently weigh trade-offs between material cost, weldability,...