2205 vs 2507 – Composition, Heat Treatment, Properties, and Applications
Share
Table Of Content
Table Of Content
Introduction
Duplex stainless steels 2205 and 2507 (commonly called “super duplex”) are widely specified where higher strength and improved corrosion resistance are required compared with austenitic grades. Engineers and procurement teams commonly face a trade-off between cost, weldability, and the level of localized corrosion resistance needed for service in chloride-bearing media. Manufacturing planners must balance forming and machining difficulty against the savings from reduced section thickness due to higher strength.
The principal technical distinction is that 2507 contains higher chromium, molybdenum and nitrogen than 2205, producing greater pitting and crevice corrosion resistance and higher yield/tensile strength at the expense of somewhat reduced formability and higher material cost. That compositional strategy—raising Cr, Mo and N while maintaining a duplex ferritic–austenitic balance—is why these two grades are compared for aggressive environments and load-critical applications.
1. Standards and Designations
- 2205: Commonly designated UNS S32205 / S32266; specified in ASTM/ASME (e.g., A240, A182 for wrought and forged products), EN (1.4462), JIS and GB equivalents exist.
- 2507: Commonly designated UNS S32750; specified in ASTM/ASME and EN (1.4410 often used for super duplex) and other regional standards.
Categorization: - Both 2205 and 2507 are stainless steels (specifically duplex stainless steels). They are not carbon steels, tool steels, or HSLA grades.
2. Chemical Composition and Alloying Strategy
The following table summarizes typical composition ranges for these two duplex grades (mill-certified ranges vary by standard and manufacturer). Elements not listed are typically present as balance iron or trace levels.
| Element | 2205 (typical range, wt%) | 2507 (typical range, wt%) |
|---|---|---|
| C | ≤ 0.03 | ≤ 0.03 |
| Mn | ≤ 2.0 | ≤ 2.0 |
| Si | ≤ 1.0 | ≤ 1.0 |
| P | ≤ 0.03 | ≤ 0.03 |
| S | ≤ 0.02 | ≤ 0.02 |
| Cr | 22.0–23.0 | 24.0–26.0 |
| Ni | 4.5–6.5 | 6.0–8.0 |
| Mo | 3.0–3.5 | 3.5–4.5 |
| V | typically trace/none | typically trace/none |
| Nb / Ti | typically none | typically none |
| B | typically none | typically none |
| N | 0.14–0.20 | 0.24–0.32 |
| Fe | Balance | Balance |
How the alloying affects properties - Chromium: primary contributor to passive film formation and pitting resistance; higher Cr increases general corrosion resistance and raises strength slightly in duplex grades. - Molybdenum: enhances pitting and crevice resistance in chloride-containing media. - Nitrogen: stabilizes the austenite phase and strongly increases yield strength and pitting resistance (per PREN), also improving resistance to stress corrosion cracking in many duplex grades. - Nickel: balances the ferrite–austenite phase fraction; higher Ni in 2507 helps maintain a duplex microstructure despite higher Cr and Mo. - Low carbon minimizes carbide precipitation and intergranular corrosion susceptibility.
3. Microstructure and Heat Treatment Response
Typical microstructures - Both grades are duplex — a roughly equal mixture of ferrite (δ) and austenite (γ) in the annealed condition. The volume fraction target is commonly near 50/50 but varies with product form and thermal history. - 2205: stable duplex microstructure with austenite formed by Cr–Ni–N partitioning; balanced for good toughness and corrosion resistance. - 2507: duplex microstructure with higher alloy levels; requires careful control of thermal cycles to avoid excessive ferrite or deleterious intermetallic phases.
Effects of thermal processes - Solution annealing (typically ~1020–1100 °C for duplex stainless steels) followed by rapid quench restores the duplex balance and dissolves intermetallic precipitates. Both grades benefit from proper solution treatment after hot forming or heavy welding to recover properties. - Slow cooling or prolonged exposure in the 600–950 °C range promotes sigma, chi, or other intermetallic phase formation, which embrittles the material and degrades corrosion resistance. This is a greater concern for 2507 because the higher Cr and Mo content increases the thermodynamic driving force for intermetallics. - Cold working increases strength by work hardening and shifts the ferrite–austenite balance; duplex steels are often produced in heavy gauge or plate with controlled thermo-mechanical treatment to achieve desired mechanical properties. - Unlike carbon steels, typical quench-and-temper cycles are not applied to duplex stainless steels; control is principally via solution annealing and cold work.
4. Mechanical Properties
The values below are typical ranges for annealed product forms (plate, sheet, pipe) and vary by mill and heat treatment. Always use mill certificates for design.
| Property | 2205 (typical, annealed) | 2507 (typical, annealed) |
|---|---|---|
| Tensile strength (MPa) | ~620–880 | ~800–1000 |
| 0.2% Proof / Yield (MPa) | ~450–650 | ~620–800 |
| Elongation (%) | ~20–35 | ~10–25 |
| Impact toughness (Charpy V, room temp) | generally good, often ≥40 J | generally good but lower than 2205 in some conditions |
| Hardness (HRC/HB) | moderate | higher due to increased strength |
Interpretation - Strength: 2507 is generally stronger in both yield and tensile strength due to higher nitrogen and alloying additions. This allows weight-saving designs through reduced section thickness for the same load resistance. - Toughness & ductility: 2205 usually offers greater ductility and formability; 2507 trades some ductility for higher strength. Both can have excellent impact toughness when correctly processed, but 2507 is more sensitive to thermal history and intermetallic precipitation. - Designers must verify toughness for low-temperature service or impact-critical components.
5. Weldability
Weldability considerations for duplex stainless steels hinge on carbon, nitrogen content, and the alloying elements’ influence on hardenability and phase balance.
- Carbon is low in both grades, limiting carbide formation and improving weldability.
- Nitrogen stabilizes austenite; loss of nitrogen in the weld pool (by de-gassing) can shift the ferrite–austenite balance, so proper filler chemistry and shielding gas are important.
- Higher Cr/Mo in 2507 increases the risk of intermetallic phase formation in the heat-affected zone (HAZ) if cooling rates are slow or post-weld heat input is excessive. Therefore, 2507 requires stricter control of heat input and interpass temperature than 2205.
Common weldability indices (qualitative use) - Carbon equivalent (IIW) and Pcm can be used to assess susceptibility to hydrogen-induced cold cracking. Example formulas: $$CE_{IIW} = C + \frac{Mn}{6} + \frac{Cr+Mo+V}{5} + \frac{Ni+Cu}{15}$$ $$P_{cm} = C + \frac{Si}{30} + \frac{Mn+Cu}{20} + \frac{Cr+Mo+V}{10} + \frac{Ni}{40} + \frac{Nb}{50} + \frac{Ti}{30} + \frac{B}{1000}$$ - Use these formulas qualitatively: both grades typically have low CE/Pcm compared with high-carbon steels, but 2507’s higher alloy content increases its CE/Pcm versus 2205.
Practical notes - Preheat is generally minimal for duplex stainless steels; avoid excessive preheat and maintain appropriate interpass temperatures to prevent sigma formation. - Use matching or over-alloyed filler metals to restore alloy balance in weld metal. Post-weld solution annealing is rarely practical for large fabricated structures but may be used for critical components. - Post-weld mechanical testing and corrosion testing (e.g., pitting resistance or ASTM G48) are recommended for critical assemblies, especially for 2507.
6. Corrosion and Surface Protection
For stainless duplex grades, standard surface protection by finish and passivation is effective; galvanizing is not applicable for stainless grades.
Pitting Resistance Equivalent Number (PREN) - PREN is commonly used to estimate resistance to chloride pitting: $$ \text{PREN} = \text{Cr} + 3.3 \times \text{Mo} + 16 \times \text{N} $$ - Because 2507 has higher Cr, Mo and N than 2205, it has a higher PREN and therefore superior resistance to pitting and crevice corrosion in chloride-containing environments. PREN is a guideline—microstructure, inclusions, and surface condition also influence real-world performance.
When PREN is not applicable - PREN targets pitting resistance in chloride media; for general corrosion, uniform corrosion rates in oxidizing acid or alkaline solutions cannot be inferred solely from PREN. Stress corrosion cracking (SCC) resistance depends on metallurgical condition, stress state and environment; duplex steels are generally more SCC-resistant than austenitic grades but SCC behavior can vary.
7. Fabrication, Machinability, and Formability
- Machinability: Both grades work-harden during cutting. 2507’s higher strength and alloy content make it somewhat more difficult to machine — requiring rigid setups, sharp tooling, reduced depths of cut, and often slower feed rates. Tool materials and coolant selection are important.
- Forming/bending: 2205 is easier to form than 2507 because of higher ductility. 2507 may require larger bend radii, reduced deformation per pass, and more frequent annealing steps for severe forming.
- Surface finishing: Mechanical and chemical polishing are similar for both grades, but 2507 may require more aggressive methods to remove sub-surface deformation from machining.
8. Typical Applications
| 2205 (Applications) | 2507 (Applications) |
|---|---|
| Heat exchangers, piping and fittings in chemical and petrochemical plants | Subsea and topside components in deepwater oil & gas |
| Seawater systems, desalination components with moderate chloride levels | Highly aggressive chloride environments, e.g., chloride-rich wells, high-temperature brines |
| Pressure vessels, storage tanks where high strength and corrosion resistance are needed but budget constrained | Critical flanges, umbilicals, valves and manifolds requiring highest pitting and crevice resistance |
| Pulp and paper digesters and process equipment | Applications where section thickness reduction is required due to high loads and corrosive media |
Selection rationale - Choose 2205 where a balance of strength, toughness and corrosion resistance is required at more moderate chloride exposure and where forming and welding efficiency are priorities. - Choose 2507 where the environment is especially aggressive (high chloride, high temperature), where higher allowable stress permits reduced thickness, or where maximum pitting/crevice resistance is required.
9. Cost and Availability
- Cost: 2507 is consistently more expensive than 2205 due to higher alloy content (notably Ni, Mo and N) and tighter processing controls. Material cost differences can be substantial and must be balanced against lifecycle benefits and possible section savings.
- Availability: 2205 is widely available in plate, pipe, fittings and fasteners. 2507 is commercially available but less ubiquitous; long lead times are possible for some product forms or custom sizes. Procurement planners should consider lead time and mill testing requirements when specifying 2507.
10. Summary and Recommendation
| Criterion | 2205 | 2507 |
|---|---|---|
| Weldability | Better (more tolerant) | Good but requires stricter heat input control |
| Strength–Toughness balance | High strength with good ductility | Higher strength, somewhat lower ductility |
| Cost | Lower (more economical) | Higher (premium) |
Choose 2205 if: - You need a robust duplex grade with good general corrosion and SCC resistance, better formability and easier welding, and a lower material cost. - Service involves moderate chloride exposure where 2205’s PREN and microstructure are adequate.
Choose 2507 if: - The environment is highly aggressive (high chloride, higher temperatures, or tight crevice conditions) and the highest pitting/crevice resistance is required. - You need higher yield/tensile strength to reduce section thickness or meet stringent load requirements and are prepared to accept higher material costs and tighter fabrication controls.
Final note: Mill certificates, actual product form, fabrication history, and site-service testing (e.g., pitting/crevice corrosion testing on welded joints) are essential inputs to finalize grade selection. Always validate design values against supplier data and relevant codes for safety-critical components.