A572 Gr50 vs A992 – Composition, Heat Treatment, Properties, and Applications
Share
Table Of Content
Table Of Content
Introduction
Selecting between ASTM A572 Grade 50 (A572 Gr50) and ASTM A992 (A992) is a common dilemma for engineers, procurement managers, and fabricators specifying structural steel. Decisions typically hinge on trade-offs among strength, notch toughness, weldability, cost, and the intended product form—plate and fabricated bridge components versus hot-rolled wide-flange shapes for buildings.
The key operational distinction is that A572 Gr50 is a general-purpose high-strength low-alloy (HSLA) plate/shape grade frequently used in infrastructure applications, while A992 is a shape-specific structural steel grade optimized for rolled wide-flange members used in building framing and architectural structures. This comparison focuses on chemistry, microstructure, mechanical behavior, fabrication characteristics, and application-driven selection criteria.
1. Standards and Designations
- ASTM/ASME:
- A572 Grade 50 — "High-strength low-alloy Columbium-Vanadium (HSLA) structural steel" (commonly used for plate, shapes, bars).
- A992 — "Structural Steel for Steel Wide-Flange Shapes" (intended primarily for rolled beams and columns).
- EN/JIS/GB:
- Rough equivalents exist (e.g., EN S355 series for structural HSLA steels), but direct one-to-one mapping is not exact because ASTM shapes vs. EN plate/structural product rules differ.
- Classification:
- A572 Gr50: HSLA (high-strength low-alloy) carbon steel with optional microalloying.
- A992: HSLA/structural carbon steel specially specified for rolled wide-flange shapes (not stainless or tool steel).
2. Chemical Composition and Alloying Strategy
The two grades share similar base chemistries (low carbon, controlled Mn and Si) but differ in specified tightness and allowance for microalloying. The table below shows the typical standard limits or characteristic specifications commonly referenced from ASTM documents and mill practice. Exact limits vary with product form and purchasing specification; consult the standard or mill certificates for precise values.
| Element | A572 Grade 50 (typical spec limits) | A992 (typical spec limits) |
|---|---|---|
| C | ≤ 0.23% (max) | ≤ 0.23% (max) |
| Mn | ≤ 1.35% (max) | ≤ 1.35% (max) |
| Si | ≤ 0.40% (max) | ≤ 0.40% (max) |
| P | ≤ 0.035% (max) | ≤ 0.035% (max) |
| S | ≤ 0.040% (max) | ≤ 0.045% (max, often tighter in practice) |
| Cr | Not specified (residual) | Not specified (residual) |
| Ni | Not specified (residual) | Not specified (residual) |
| Mo | Not specified (residual) | Not specified (residual) |
| V | May be present as microalloy (trace) | May be present as microalloy (trace) |
| Nb (Cb) | May be present in microalloyed variants | Typically limited to residuals (depends on mill) |
| Ti | Not normally specified | Not normally specified |
| B | Not specified | Not specified |
| N | Residual levels controlled | Residual levels controlled |
Notes: - Both standards emphasize low carbon and controlled Mn/Si to balance strength and weldability. - A572 Gr50 mill grades frequently employ microalloying (Nb, V, Ti) and thermo-mechanical rolling strategies to achieve 50 ksi yield with good toughness—this is common for plate used in bridge applications. - A992 chemistry is tightened for rolled wide-flange production and may have restrictions designed to limit hardenability and assure ductile fracture behavior in beam sections.
How alloying affects performance: - Carbon and manganese raise strength/hardenability but reduce weldability and increase carbon equivalent. - Microalloying elements (Nb, V, Ti) provide precipitation strengthening and grain refinement, improving strength without large increases in carbon. - Silicon is used as a deoxidizer and slightly increases strength. - Sulfur and phosphorus are limited to preserve toughness and minimize segregation.
3. Microstructure and Heat Treatment Response
Typical microstructures for both grades are primarily ferrite–pearlite or ferrite with bainitic constituents depending on thermo-mechanical processing.
- A572 Gr50:
- Often produced using controlled rolling and accelerated cooling or microalloying to produce fine-grained ferrite and dispersed microalloy precipitates (Nb/V/Ti carbides or carbonitrides).
- Microalloy precipitates increase yield strength by precipitation hardening and by restricting grain growth.
-
Heat treatment: generally supplied as-rolled or normalized rather than quenched-and-tempered. Localized heat (weld HAZ) can form finer or coarser microstructures depending on thermal cycles; microalloyed grades can show increased hardenability locally.
-
A992:
- Produced for consistent properties in rolled shapes, with a balance of ferrite and tempered bainitic regions depending on rolling conditions.
- Process control aims for predictable toughness and ductility across beam flanges and webs.
- Heat treatment: as-rolled; not intended for quench-and-temper. Like A572, welding introduces HAZ microstructure changes, but the lower hardenability design reduces risk of brittle martensite formation.
Effect of post-processing: - Normalizing/refining cycles can improve toughness for both but are not commonly specified for rolled beams. - Quenching and tempering is not typical for these structural grades; such treatments would produce higher-strength alloys and are outside typical ASTM designations. - Thermo-mechanical controlled processing (TMCP) used by mills can produce superior strength–toughness balance without heavy alloy additions.
4. Mechanical Properties
The following table summarizes typical mechanical property ranges for structural practice. These are representative ranges; consult mill test reports and standards for guaranteed minimums.
| Property | A572 Grade 50 (typical) | A992 (typical) |
|---|---|---|
| Yield Strength (min) | 50 ksi (345 MPa) | 50 ksi (345 MPa) |
| Tensile Strength (typical range) | ≈ 65–80 ksi (450–550 MPa) | ≈ 65–85 ksi (450–585 MPa) |
| Elongation (typical) | ≥ 18% (varies with thickness) | ≥ 18% (varies with thickness) |
| Impact Toughness (Charpy) | Specified by purchaser; good low-temperature toughness in microalloyed plates | Often specified for shapes; controlled for building applications |
| Hardness | Moderate; typical HRC low (suitable for forming/welding) | Similar; designed to avoid excessive hardness in HAZ |
Interpretation: - Both grades provide a 50 ksi yield level; tensile strengths overlap. A992’s tensile envelope and maximum yield-to-tensile (Y/T) controls are tailored to structural shapes to avoid brittle behavior. - Toughness depends on processing, thickness, and specific impact testing requirements; both can be produced with good notch toughness for structural service.
5. Weldability
Weldability depends on carbon content, carbon equivalent (hardening tendency), and the presence of microalloying elements.
Useful predictive formulas (qualitative interpretation only): - International Institute of Welding carbon equivalent: $$CE_{IIW} = C + \frac{Mn}{6} + \frac{Cr+Mo+V}{5} + \frac{Ni+Cu}{15}$$ - International soldering carbon equivalent (Pcm): $$P_{cm} = C + \frac{Si}{30} + \frac{Mn+Cu}{20} + \frac{Cr+Mo+V}{10} + \frac{Ni}{40} + \frac{Nb}{50} + \frac{Ti}{30} + \frac{B}{1000}$$
Qualitative points: - Both grades have low carbon and controlled Mn/Si, resulting in moderate carbon equivalent and generally good weldability with standard structural welding procedures. - A992 is intentionally constrained to limit hardenability and to control yield-to-tensile ratio; this makes it particularly weld-friendly for wide-flange sections in building construction. - A572 Gr50 plates that incorporate microalloying (Nb, V) or that are thicker may exhibit increased HAZ hardenability; preheat or controlled welding procedures may be necessary for thick sections or severe service to avoid HAZ cracking. - Interpretation: use CE and Pcm to assess need for preheat, interpass temperature, and post-weld heat treatment on a case-by-case basis. For critical welds, follow AWS D1.1 and company welding procedure specifications (WPS).
6. Corrosion and Surface Protection
- Neither A572 Gr50 nor A992 is stainless; both are subject to atmospheric corrosion and require surface protection for long-term exposure.
- Typical protections: hot-dip galvanizing, shop-applied zinc-rich primers, epoxy/urethane systems, metallizing, or protective coatings specified by design codes.
- PREN (pitting resistance equivalent number) is not applicable to non-stainless structural carbon steels: $$\text{PREN} = \text{Cr} + 3.3 \times \text{Mo} + 16 \times \text{N}$$ This index applies to stainless alloys and is irrelevant for A572/A992.
Practical guidance: - For bridge and coastal applications, specify corrosion-resistant coatings and consider weathering steels or duplex systems if extended life without maintenance is a requirement—A572 Gr50 is commonly used in bridge superstructures with protective coatings.
7. Fabrication, Machinability, and Formability
- Cutting: plasma, oxy-fuel, and high-speed machining work well on both; thermal cutting may require edge grinding before welding to remove heat-affected zones.
- Bending and forming: both grades are formable but are stronger than plain carbon steels; minimum bend radii and forming practices must account for yield strength and thickness.
- Machinability: moderate; stronger grades can increase tool wear. A572 variants with microalloying may be slightly tougher on cutting tools.
- Surface finish and straightness: A992 rolled shapes are produced with geometric tolerances optimized for beam fabrication (straightness, flange planarity), reducing secondary processing for erection.
8. Typical Applications
| A572 Grade 50 | A992 |
|---|---|
| Bridge components (girders, plate girders), heavy plate and welded fabrications, structural plates, general HSLA applications | Rolled wide-flange beams and columns for buildings, industrial framing, multi-story steel structures, standard structural shapes |
| Heavy fabrication requiring high strength plate and good toughness | Production of W-shapes and I-beams where consistent section properties and weldability in shop/field are critical |
Selection rationale: - Choose A572 Gr50 when you need plate strength combined with good toughness for infrastructure (bridge decks, plate girders) and where plate fabrication dominates. - Choose A992 when specifying wide-flange shapes for building frames where predictable section properties, ductility, and weldability in rolled forms are prioritized.
9. Cost and Availability
- Availability:
- A992 is widely available in North America for rolled wide-flange sections because it is the dominant specification for building shapes.
- A572 Gr50 is widely available for plate, bars, and some rolled sections; it is common in bridge and general structural supply chains.
- Cost:
- Material cost differences are typically modest and depend on market conditions and product form. Rolled shapes specified to A992 may benefit from production economies of scale for beams and columns.
- Plates to A572 Gr50 (especially thick, microalloyed plate) can be more expensive per ton because of processing and alloy control.
- Procurement tip: evaluate total installed cost (material + fabrication + welding + coatings + schedule), not just raw $/ton.
10. Summary and Recommendation
| Criterion | A572 Grade 50 | A992 |
|---|---|---|
| Weldability | Good; may require attention on thick, microalloyed plate | Very good; chemistries and Y/T controls favor beam welding |
| Strength–Toughness balance | Excellent when TMCP or microalloyed; commonly used for low-temp bridge steel | Optimized for ductility and predictable behavior in wide-flange shapes |
| Cost / Availability | Widely available for plate/fabrication; price varies with thickness/processing | Widely available for beams; cost-effective for rolled shapes in building market |
Final recommendations: - Choose A572 Grade 50 if you are specifying plate-heavy fabrications (bridge girders, welded plate structures) where high strength combined with good low-temperature toughness is required and where the fabrication process is designed to handle potential microalloying effects. - Choose A992 if you are specifying hot-rolled wide-flange shapes for building framing where consistent rolled-section geometry, controlled yield-to-tensile behavior, and excellent weldability in beam production and erection are priorities.
Concluding note: both A572 Gr50 and A992 are robust, widely used HSLA structural steels. The right choice depends on product form (plate vs. rolled shapes), fabrication methods, required fracture toughness, and welding constraints. Always verify mill certificates and specify any required impact testing, coating systems, or welding procedures in procurement documents.