Steel Compare

304 vs 316 – Composition, Heat Treatment, Prope...

Introduction Type 304 and Type 316 austenitic stainless steels are among the most widely specified grades in engineering, procurement, and manufacturing. The selection dilemma for engineers and procurement managers usually...

304 vs 304H – Composition, Heat Treatment, Prop...

Introduction Type 304 and type 304H stainless steels are two austenitic stainless grades widely used across process, pressure-vessel, and general fabrication industries. Engineers and procurement professionals commonly weigh corrosion resistance,...

304 vs 304L – Composition, Heat Treatment, Prop...

Introduction Stainless steels 304 and 304L are among the most widely specified austenitic grades in engineering, manufacturing, and procurement. Engineers and procurement managers typically weigh corrosion resistance, weldability, mechanical strength,...

301 vs 304 – Composition, Heat Treatment, Prope...

Introduction 301 and 304 are two of the most commonly specified austenitic stainless steels in fabrication, automotive, appliance, and architectural work. Engineers and procurement teams routinely weigh trade-offs between corrosion...

304L vs 347 – Composition, Heat Treatment, Prop...

Introduction Stainless steels 304L and 347 are two widely used austenitic grades that often compete for the same applications. Engineers, procurement managers, and manufacturing planners frequently weigh corrosion resistance, weldability,...

431 vs 440C – Composition, Heat Treatment, Prop...

Introduction AISI/SAE 431 and 440C are two widely used martensitic stainless steels that commonly compete for applications requiring a balance between strength, wear resistance, and corrosion performance. Engineers, procurement managers,...

420 vs 431 – Composition, Heat Treatment, Prope...

Introduction Engineers, procurement managers, and manufacturing planners frequently confront the choice between AISI 420 and AISI 431 martensitic stainless steels when specifying parts that require a balance of strength, hardness,...

410 vs 420 – Composition, Heat Treatment, Prope...

Introduction Engineers and procurement professionals frequently choose between AISI 410 and AISI 420 when specifying martensitic stainless steels for components that must balance cost, formability, strength, and moderate corrosion resistance....

440A vs 440C – Composition, Heat Treatment, Pro...

Introduction 440A and 440C are two closely related martensitic stainless steels widely used where a combination of hardness, wear resistance, and moderate corrosion resistance is required. Engineers and procurement teams...

420 vs 440A – Composition, Heat Treatment, Prop...

Introduction AISI 420 and AISI 440A are martensitic stainless steels commonly considered where a balance of corrosion resistance, hardness, and cost is required. Engineers, procurement managers, and manufacturing planners routinely...

420 vs 430 – Composition, Heat Treatment, Prope...

Introduction Engineers and procurement teams frequently face a trade-off between hardenability/wear resistance and corrosion resistance when selecting stainless steels for components such as fasteners, blades, valve parts, and appliance panels....

441 vs 444 – Composition, Heat Treatment, Prope...

Introduction Engineers, procurement managers, and manufacturing planners frequently face the choice between ferritic stainless steels 441 and 444 when specifying materials for corrosion‑resistant components, particularly where cost, formability, and high‑temperature...

439 vs 441 – Composition, Heat Treatment, Prope...

Introduction Engineers, procurement managers, and manufacturing planners routinely choose between ferritic stainless steels when designing exhaust systems, heat-resisting components, or corrosion-resistant sheetwork. The 439 and 441 grades are two ferritic...

430 vs 439 – Composition, Heat Treatment, Prope...

Introduction Engineers, procurement managers, and manufacturing planners frequently choose between 430 and 439 when specifying ferritic stainless steels for applications that must balance corrosion resistance, cost, and formability. Typical decision...

430 vs 446 – Composition, Heat Treatment, Prope...

Introduction Type 430 and Type 446 are two ferritic stainless-steel grades commonly considered when a design must balance corrosion resistance, thermal stability, formability, and cost. Procurement and engineering teams often...

310 vs 310S – Composition, Heat Treatment, Prop...

Introduction Type 310 and 310S are austenitic stainless steels commonly specified for high-temperature service. Engineers, procurement managers, and manufacturing planners frequently weigh the trade-offs between corrosion resistance, high-temperature strength, and...

321 vs 347 – Composition, Heat Treatment, Prope...

Introduction Type 321 and Type 347 are both austenitic, chromium-nickel stainless steels widely used in engineered systems where corrosion resistance, formability, and elevated-temperature stability are required. Engineers, procurement managers, and...

316L vs 904L – Composition, Heat Treatment, Pro...

Introduction Engineers, procurement managers, and manufacturing planners routinely face a trade-off between corrosion resistance, mechanical performance, manufacturability, and cost when selecting austenitic stainless steels. 316L and 904L are both austenitic...

316L vs 317L – Composition, Heat Treatment, Pro...

Introduction Austenitic stainless steels 316L and 317L are common selections where corrosion resistance, formability, and weldability are required. Engineers, procurement managers, and manufacturing planners frequently weigh the trade-offs between corrosion...

316 vs 317L – Composition, Heat Treatment, Prop...

Introduction Grade 316 and grade 317L are austenitic stainless steels commonly specified where corrosion resistance outweighs the need for high strength. Engineers, procurement managers, and manufacturing planners routinely weigh trade-offs...

316 vs 316Ti – Composition, Heat Treatment, Pro...

Introduction Type 316 and type 316Ti are both austenitic stainless steels widely used across chemical processing, marine, food, and heat-exchanger industries. Engineers, procurement managers, and manufacturing planners commonly face a...

316 vs 316L – Composition, Heat Treatment, Prop...

Introduction Type 316 and 316L stainless steels are two of the most common austenitic stainless grades used across process, marine, chemical, and medical industries. Engineers, procurement managers, and manufacturing planners...

2205 vs 2507 – Composition, Heat Treatment, Pro...

Introduction Duplex stainless steels 2205 and 2507 are frequently pitted against each other when designers and procurement teams must balance corrosion resistance, mechanical strength, weldability, and life‑cycle cost. Typical decision...

304 vs 2205 – Composition, Heat Treatment, Prop...

Introduction Engineers and procurement professionals routinely face a common materials selection dilemma: prioritize corrosion resistance and weldability at economical cost, or invest in a higher-strength alloy that resists localized corrosion...

304 vs 204Cu – Composition, Heat Treatment, Pro...

Introduction Engineers, procurement managers, and manufacturing planners often face a trade-off when selecting between a well-established austenitic stainless like 304 and lower‑nickel alternatives such as 204Cu. The typical decision contexts...

904L vs 254SMO – Composition, Heat Treatment, P...

Introduction 904L and 254SMO are two high-performance austenitic stainless steels frequently considered for aggressive chemical and marine environments. Engineers and procurement teams commonly weigh trade-offs between corrosion resistance, cost, weldability,...

M2 vs M35 – Composition, Heat Treatment, Proper...

Introduction M2 and M35 are two widely used high-speed tool steels (HSS) encountered frequently in the selection process for cutting tools, punches, dies, and wear components. Engineers, procurement managers, and...

S136 vs 420 – Composition, Heat Treatment, Prop...

Introduction S136 and 420 are both martensitic stainless steels frequently considered for components where hardness, polishability, and some corrosion resistance are required. Engineers, procurement managers, and manufacturing planners commonly face...

NAK80 vs S136 – Composition, Heat Treatment, Pr...

Introduction NAK80 and S136 are two widely used mold steels in the injection-molding and tooling industries. Engineers, procurement managers, and manufacturing planners commonly face the decision between these grades when...

P20 vs NAK80 – Composition, Heat Treatment, Pro...

Introduction P20 and NAK80 are two widely used mold and tool steels for plastic-injection and die-casting tooling. Engineers, procurement teams, and manufacturing planners commonly weigh trade-offs between total part cost,...