Q370R vs Q420R – Composition, Heat Treatment, Properties, and Applications
แบ่งปัน
Table Of Content
Table Of Content
Introduction
Q370R and Q420R are names used in Chinese pressure-vessel steel nomenclature to denote higher-strength, non-stainless structural steels intended for pressure-containing equipment. Engineers, procurement managers, and manufacturing planners commonly face a selection dilemma between these two grades: choosing a lower-strength grade with relatively easier fabrication and welding, or selecting a higher-strength grade that allows thinner sections and weight savings but can impose stricter heat‑treatment and welding controls.
The fundamental trade-off between these grades is effectively a balance of achievable design strength versus practical weldability and toughness management in fabrication. Because both grades are used in similar application domains (pressure vessels, boilers, and heavy structural components), understanding their differences in alloying strategy, microstructure response to thermal processing, mechanical behavior, and fabrication implications is essential for an optimal material selection.
1. Standards and Designations
- Primary national system: Chinese GB (national standards). The suffix “R” in these designations indicates applicability to pressure-retaining equipment.
- There is no single direct one-to-one equivalence in ASTM/ASME or EN systems; selection against international standards should be done by matching required mechanical and toughness properties rather than by direct grade substitution.
- Classification: both Q370R and Q420R are non-stainless, higher-strength carbon-manganese (low-alloy) steels commonly categorized as HSLA-type steels for pressure-vessel use rather than as tool or stainless steels.
2. Chemical Composition and Alloying Strategy
The following table summarizes the typical compositional elements of interest for comparison. Exact guaranteed chemical ranges vary by producer and standard sheet/specification; the table intentionally uses qualitative indicators rather than numerical values to avoid misrepresentation.
| Element | Q370R (typical emphasis) | Q420R (typical emphasis) |
|---|---|---|
| C (Carbon) | Moderate — controlled to balance strength and weldability | Slightly higher or controlled differently to raise yield strength |
| Mn (Manganese) | Moderate — main strength and deoxidation element | Moderate to higher — contributes to strength and hardenability |
| Si (Silicon) | Low–moderate — deoxidation, limited strengthening | Low–moderate |
| P (Phosphorus) | Kept low — impurity control | Kept low |
| S (Sulfur) | Minimized for toughness and weldability | Minimized |
| Cr (Chromium) | Usually very low or absent | May be present in minor amounts in some variants |
| Ni (Nickel) | Typically low to absent | Typically low to absent |
| Mo (Molybdenum) | Often absent or minimal | Sometimes present in small amounts to improve hardenability |
| V, Nb, Ti (microalloying) | May include microalloying in small amounts for grain refinement | More likely to include microalloying to increase strength at given thickness |
| B (Boron) | Typically absent or trace | Trace B may be used in some higher-strength variants |
| N (Nitrogen) | Controlled as impurity/secondary strengthening | Controlled |
How alloying affects behavior: - Carbon and manganese are principal strengtheners; increasing them raises yield and tensile strength but also increases hardenability and propensity to form hard martensite in weld heat-affected zones (HAZ). - Microalloying elements (Nb, V, Ti) provide precipitation strengthening and grain refinement, enabling higher strength without excessive carbon and improving toughness when properly processed. - Small additions of Mo or Cr can increase hardenability and high-temperature strength but negatively affect weldability if not carefully managed.
3. Microstructure and Heat Treatment Response
Typical microstructures: - Under conventional processing, Q370R tends toward a fine-grained ferrite–pearlite or ferrite-plus-bainite microstructure, designed for a good balance of ductility and toughness. - Q420R, aiming for higher yield/tensile properties, often relies on finer-grained ferrite with more bainitic or tempered martensitic constituents in heavier sections or when thermo-mechanical treatments are used. Microalloying and controlled rolling/normalizing are tools to achieve strength without excessive carbon content.
Heat treatment and processing effects: - Normalizing (air cooling after heating) refines grain size and can homogenize microstructure for both grades, improving toughness. - Quenching and tempering (Q&T) is less common for bulk pressure-vessel plate but may be applied for components requiring higher strength and controlled toughness; Q420R is more likely to be produced or finished with thermomechanical rolling or normalization plus controlled cooling to reach specified values. - Thermo-mechanical controlled processing (TMCP) with accelerated cooling can produce fine bainitic/ferritic microstructures that improve strength and toughness simultaneously — especially useful for Q420R where strength targets are higher.
4. Mechanical Properties
Because numerical guarantees vary by specification and manufacturer, the comparison below is qualitative, indicating relative expectations under the intended specification envelopes.
| Property | Q370R | Q420R |
|---|---|---|
| Tensile Strength | Moderate | Higher (designed to meet a higher strength class) |
| Yield Strength | Moderate | Higher (primary differentiator) |
| Elongation (ductility) | Good | Good to slightly reduced at equal thickness due to higher strength |
| Impact Toughness | Generally good (designed for pressure use) | Can be equivalent but requires stricter processing and control to ensure comparable toughness |
| Hardness | Moderate | Higher (reflecting higher strength) |
Interpretation: - Q420R is engineered to deliver higher yield and tensile strength; to keep adequate toughness, producers rely on microalloying and controlled thermomechanical processing rather than simple increases in carbon. - If processing and quality control are not tight, higher-strength grades can show reduced ductility and increased sensitivity to brittle fracture mechanisms, particularly in thick sections or low-temperature service.
5. Weldability
Weldability depends primarily on carbon content, effective alloying for hardenability, and residual impurity levels. Two common empirical indices used to assess weldability:
-
Carbon equivalent (IIW): $$CE_{IIW} = C + \frac{Mn}{6} + \frac{Cr+Mo+V}{5} + \frac{Ni+Cu}{15}$$
-
Pcm (more conservative index for weld cracking susceptibility): $$P_{cm} = C + \frac{Si}{30} + \frac{Mn+Cu}{20} + \frac{Cr+Mo+V}{10} + \frac{Ni}{40} + \frac{Nb}{50} + \frac{Ti}{30} + \frac{B}{1000}$$
Qualitative interpretation: - Q370R typically has a lower effective carbon-equivalent than Q420R, yielding easier preheat/post‑weld requirements and lower risk of HAZ hardening and cold cracking. - Q420R, because of its higher strength target and potential microalloy additions or slightly higher Mn, usually has a higher CE or Pcm and therefore can require more stringent welding procedures: controlled interpass temperatures, preheating, post-weld heat treatment (PWHT) in some cases, or low-hydrogen consumables. - Properly specified welding consumables, controlled heat input, and hydrogen control are necessary for Q420R to maintain HAZ toughness and avoid brittle fracture. Welding procedure qualification should be performed with representative thicknesses.
6. Corrosion and Surface Protection
- Both Q370R and Q420R are non-stainless carbon/low-alloy steels — they do not provide intrinsic corrosion resistance like stainless grades.
- Standard protection strategies: painting/coating systems, galvanizing (hot-dip or electro), corrosion inhibitors, or cladding/lining depending on the service environment.
- PREN (pitting resistance equivalent number) is not applicable to these non-stainless steels; for reference, the common PREN formula used for stainless alloys is: $$\text{PREN} = \text{Cr} + 3.3 \times \text{Mo} + 16 \times \text{N}$$
- Selection for corrosive environments should focus on appropriate protective systems or selection of stainless/alloyed cladding where necessary.
7. Fabrication, Machinability, and Formability
- Cutting: both grades will cut similarly with modern oxy-fuel, plasma, or laser processes, but Q420R’s higher strength may demand slightly more power and produce harder kerfs/residues.
- Bending and forming: Q370R generally tolerates cold forming and bending better due to slightly lower yield; Q420R requires tighter bend radii control and may necessitate larger form allowances or warm-forming for thick sections.
- Machinability: both are reasonably machinable in plate form, but higher-strength microalloyed steels (Q420R) can accelerate tool wear; tool grade and cutting parameters should be adjusted accordingly.
- Finishing: surface treatments (shot-blasting, grinding) do not differ markedly, though higher hardness in Q420R can affect process times.
8. Typical Applications
| Q370R — Typical Uses | Q420R — Typical Uses |
|---|---|
| General pressure vessels and boilers where good toughness and straightforward fabrication are prioritized | Pressure vessels and structural components where higher design strength enables thinner sections or weight-saving designs |
| Tanks and vessels with moderate internal pressures and where welding productivity is critical | High-pressure vessels, heavy-duty structural frames, and components subject to higher stress demands |
| Applications where cost-sensitive fabrication and simpler welding procedures are desired | Applications where minimizing mass or maximizing allowable stress is important and fabrication controls can be enforced |
Selection rationale: - Choose Q370R when fabrication speed, simpler welding procedures, and proven toughness in thicker plates are top priorities. - Choose Q420R when design constraints demand higher allowable stresses or weight reduction, and the project can accommodate stricter welding procedures and quality control.
9. Cost and Availability
- Cost: Q420R is generally more expensive on a per-kilogram basis than Q370R because of higher strength processing, potential microalloy additions, and tighter quality controls. However, weight savings from using thinner Q420R sections can offset material cost in total component cost.
- Availability: Both grades are commonly produced in plate form for pressure equipment in markets where Chinese grades are supplied; local availability will depend on mill production and regional supply chains. Lead times can be impacted by thickness, temper, and testing requirements.
10. Summary and Recommendation
| Characteristic | Q370R | Q420R |
|---|---|---|
| Weldability | Better / Easier welded with standard procedures | Requires stricter welding control and sometimes preheat/PWHT |
| Strength–Toughness balance | Good balance favoring toughness and ductility | Higher strength; toughness achievable but needs controlled processing |
| Cost (material basis) | Lower per kg | Higher per kg, potential overall cost savings via thinner sections |
Concluding recommendations: - Choose Q370R if you prioritize fabrication productivity, simpler welding procedures, and robust toughness for conventional pressure-vessel work where standard thicknesses and margins are acceptable. - Choose Q420R if your design requires higher allowable stress or you need to minimize weight/thickness and you can enforce stricter procurement/processing controls, specify qualified welding procedures, and ensure supplier process capability for toughness and HAZ behavior.
Final note: Always base grade selection on the specific code requirements, thickness-dependent property tables, and project welding procedure qualifications. When in doubt, request mill material certificates, specify required impact energy and hardness limits, and perform welding procedure and qualification tests representative of component thickness and joint configuration.