Cr12 vs Cr12MoV – Composition, Heat Treatment, Properties, and Applications
แบ่งปัน
Table Of Content
Table Of Content
Introduction
Cr12 and Cr12MoV are high-chromium, high-carbon tool steels widely used for cold-work tooling, shear blades, punches, and dies. Engineers, procurement managers, and manufacturing planners commonly face a selection dilemma between prioritizing wear resistance (for long life and tight tolerances) and prioritizing resistance to chipping and fracture (for impact or interrupted cutting). The key practical difference between these grades lies in the balance of toughness versus wear resistance produced by deliberate additions of Mo and V in Cr12MoV.
Both steels are compared often because they share a chromium-rich, high-carbon base chemistry that produces hard carbides and high hardness after heat treatment, while alloying variations produce meaningful differences in hardenability, secondary hardening, and carbide dispersion—factors that determine in-service performance and processing choices.
1. Standards and Designations
Common standards and designations under which Cr12 and Cr12MoV or closely equivalent grades are found:
- GB/T (China): Cr12 is a domestic designation; Cr12MoV is the Mo-and-V alloyed variant.
- EN: Comparable tool steel families are designated as D-series (e.g., D2) or X-series depending on alloying; equivalents should be checked by chemistry.
- JIS: Japanese tool steel standards list similar high-chromium cold-work steels under JS series; check exact chemical match.
- ASTM/ASME: Tool steels are covered under ASTM A600/A681 for tool steel bars and other specifications — cross-reference by composition.
- Classification: Both Cr12 and Cr12MoV are high-carbon, high-chromium cold-work tool steels (tool steel family). They are not stainless (in the corrosion-resistance sense), nor are they HSLA structural steels.
Always confirm equivalence by checking the actual chemical composition and mechanical-property requirements in supplier certificates.
2. Chemical Composition and Alloying Strategy
Typical nominal compositions (wt%) commonly specified for commercial Cr12 and Cr12MoV grades. These are representative ranges used by manufacturers; verify actual mill certificates for procurement.
| Element | Cr12 (typical, wt%) | Cr12MoV (typical, wt%) |
|---|---|---|
| C | 1.35 – 1.65 | 1.35 – 1.65 |
| Mn | 0.20 – 0.60 | 0.20 – 0.60 |
| Si | 0.20 – 0.80 | 0.20 – 0.80 |
| P | ≤ 0.035 | ≤ 0.035 |
| S | ≤ 0.035 | ≤ 0.035 |
| Cr | 11.0 – 13.0 | 11.0 – 13.0 |
| Ni | ≤ 0.30 | ≤ 0.30 |
| Mo | ≤ 0.10 (often trace) | 0.20 – 1.00 |
| V | ≤ 0.10 (often trace) | 0.05 – 0.50 |
| Nb | ≤ 0.02 | ≤ 0.02 |
| Ti | ≤ 0.02 | ≤ 0.02 |
| B | ≤ 0.001 | ≤ 0.001 |
| N | Trace | Trace |
How the alloying elements affect properties: - Carbon (C): Primary hardening element; high C promotes high hardness via carbide formation but reduces weldability and toughness. - Chromium (Cr): Promotes formation of hard chromium carbides (M7C3/M23C6-like in high-C steels), improves wear resistance, and contributes to hardenability. - Molybdenum (Mo): Increases hardenability, refines carbide matrix, imparts secondary hardening and elevated-temperature strength, and improves toughness compared with an Mo-free counterpart. - Vanadium (V): Forms very hard, fine vanadium carbides that refine grain and improve wear resistance and resistance to abrasion; contributes to secondary hardening and toughness by pinning grain boundaries. - Manganese and Silicon: Deoxidizers and strength/hardenability modifiers in modest amounts. - P, S: Kept low to avoid embrittlement and machinability issues.
Cr12 is optimized to maximize chromium carbide content for wear resistance with minimal Mo and V. Cr12MoV adds Mo and V to improve hardenability, toughness, and carbide dispersion at the expense of slight increases in cost and decreased weldability.
3. Microstructure and Heat Treatment Response
Typical microstructures: - As-rolled or normalized: Mixture of tempered martensite/ferrite with dispersed chromium-rich carbides (Cr7C3/Cr23C6-like) and secondary carbides. Cr12 shows coarser chromium carbides; Cr12MoV shows finer, more evenly distributed carbides with Mo- and V-rich precipitates. - After quenching and tempering: Predominantly martensitic matrix with a network of stable chromium carbides and fine Mo/V carbides for Cr12MoV. Cr12 tends to retain larger, continuous carbide networks that maximize abrasion resistance but can act as crack initiation sites under impact loads.
Heat treatment response: - Normalizing: Refines grain and helps dissolve some carbides; useful prior to machining or further processing. - Hardening (austenitize and quench): Typical austenitizing temperatures for Cr12-family tool steels are high (e.g., 1000–1050°C range depending on section size and composition) to dissolve carbides as far as practical for maximum secondary hardening; ensure supplier guidance. Rapid quenching (oil or interrupted oil) produces martensite; alloy content controls retained austenite and hardenability. - Tempering: Performed at multiple tempering stages to reduce retained austenite, develop secondary hardness (especially in Mo-containing grades), and relieve stresses. Cr12MoV often exhibits stronger secondary hardening due to Mo/V carbides; this enables a slightly better toughness/hardness balance after tempering.
Thermo-mechanical processing (controlled rolling, forging) can improve toughness and uniformity of carbides, and is particularly beneficial for Cr12MoV to exploit its alloying for refined carbides.
4. Mechanical Properties
Typical mechanical property ranges after appropriate quenching and tempering; values vary with heat-treatment recipe, section size, and supplier. Confirm values from mill test reports for design.
| Property | Cr12 (typical range) | Cr12MoV (typical range) |
|---|---|---|
| Tensile strength (MPa) | 900 – 1800 | 1000 – 2000 |
| Yield strength (MPa) | 700 – 1500 | 800 – 1700 |
| Elongation (%) | 2 – 10 | 2 – 12 |
| Impact toughness (J, Charpy) | Low to moderate; improved with tempering | Moderate; generally higher than Cr12 for similar hardness |
| Hardness (HRC) | 55 – 62 (through-hardened) | 55 – 62 (through-hardened); can retain hardness better in larger sections |
Explanation: - Strength and hardness are primarily driven by carbon and martensitic matrix; both grades can reach similar peak hardness. Cr12MoV often attains comparable hardness while delivering better toughness and through-hardening due to Mo and V. - Toughness: Cr12MoV is typically tougher (less brittle) at equivalent hardness because Mo increases hardenability and V refines carbides and grain boundaries, reducing the tendency for crack propagation. - Ductility: Both are low-ductility tool steels at high hardness, but Cr12MoV can provide marginally higher elongation in certain treatments.
5. Weldability
Weldability of high-carbon, high-chromium tool steels is generally challenging. Key factors: high carbon content, carbide network, and hardenability.
Industry formulas for assessing weldability and preheating requirements: - Carbon equivalent (IIW): $$CE_{IIW} = C + \frac{Mn}{6} + \frac{Cr+Mo+V}{5} + \frac{Ni+Cu}{15}$$ - More detailed parameter (Pcm): $$P_{cm} = C + \frac{Si}{30} + \frac{Mn+Cu}{20} + \frac{Cr+Mo+V}{10} + \frac{Ni}{40} + \frac{Nb}{50} + \frac{Ti}{30} + \frac{B}{1000}$$
Interpretation: - Both formulas show the influence of C, Cr, Mo, and V on hardenability and propensity for cold cracking. Higher values indicate a need for preheat, controlled heat input, and post-weld heat treatment. - Cr12 (with high C and Cr) typically requires substantial preheat and post-weld tempering; weldability is poor without strict procedures. - Cr12MoV, with added Mo and V, increases hardenability and may raise CE/Pcm values further, which can worsen weldability in terms of cracking risk, but controlled welding procedures and matching filler metals with similar or slightly lower hardenability, preheat to reduce cooling rate, and local post-weld tempering can produce acceptable joints. - Best practice: avoid welding when possible; prefer mechanical fastening or brazing. If welding is necessary, consult welding procedure specifications (WPS) from the material supplier and perform qualification testing.
6. Corrosion and Surface Protection
Neither Cr12 nor Cr12MoV is stainless in the common sense; their chromium content improves corrosion resistance slightly compared with plain carbon steel but does not provide passivation comparable to stainless alloys.
- Surface protection options: electroplating, hot-dip galvanizing (limited for tool steels due to heat treatment changes), painting, powder coating, and application-specific coatings such as PVD/CVD, hard chrome plating, or nitriding to improve surface life and corrosion protection.
- Thermochemical treatments: Nitriding can improve surface hardness and wear performance for certain tool steel grades but must be evaluated against desired dimensions and tensile properties.
- PREN formula is not applicable to these non-stainless tool steels: $$\text{PREN} = \text{Cr} + 3.3 \times \text{Mo} + 16 \times \text{N}$$ Use of PREN is meaningful only for corrosion-resistant stainless steels; for Cr12-family steels, surface protection and coatings determine service corrosion performance.
7. Fabrication, Machinability, and Formability
- Machinability: As-annealed, both grades are machinable but more difficult than low-alloy steels due to high carbon and hard carbides. Cr12MoV may be slightly less machinable because of fine Mo/V carbides; use carbide tooling, high cutting speeds, and rigid setups. Rough machining typically performed in annealed condition.
- Grinding and finishing: Both require abrasives suited to hard carbides; Cr12’s coarser carbides can produce chatter if tooling is not optimized.
- Forming and bending: Limited cold formability due to high carbon and carbide content; forming usually performed in annealed state or avoided. Hot forming is possible but will require reheat and full heat treatment.
- Heat treatment considerations: Distortion risk during hardening and tempering requires careful fixturing and machining allowance.
8. Typical Applications
| Cr12 (common uses) | Cr12MoV (common uses) |
|---|---|
| Shear blades, guillotine blades | Heavy-duty punches and dies subject to impact and wear |
| Slitter knives, cold shear tooling | Progressive-die components where through-hardening and toughness are needed |
| Plastic mold cavities for abrasive materials | High-duty blanking and trimming dies with interrupted cutting |
| Wear plates with moderate impact exposure | Tools requiring improved resistance to chipping and longer life in larger sections |
Selection rationale: - Choose Cr12 where maximum abrasion resistance and cost-effectiveness matter and where loading is mostly continuous (sliding or steady abrasive wear) with limited impact or shock. - Choose Cr12MoV when tooling faces higher impact, intermittent cutting, larger cross-sections where through-hardening is critical, or when slightly higher toughness and resistance to crack propagation are required.
9. Cost and Availability
- Relative cost: Cr12 is generally lower cost than Cr12MoV because of the lack of molybdenum and significant vanadium. Mo and V are more expensive alloying elements and increase production costs.
- Availability: Both grades are widely available from tool-steel producers and service centers in common product forms (round bars, flat bars, plates, hardened and tempered blocks). Cr12 variants without Mo/V may be slightly more ubiquitous and cheaper in commodity batches; Cr12MoV may require inventory planning for specialty sizes or heat-treatment states.
- Product forms: Bars, plates, and pre-hardened blocks; forged and annealed blanks are available for both, with lead times depending on heat treatment and machining services.
10. Summary and Recommendation
| Property | Cr12 | Cr12MoV |
|---|---|---|
| Weldability | Poor; requires stringent preheat/post-heat | Poor to moderate; requires careful control, may be worse by CE but offers modes to reduce cracking risk |
| Strength–Toughness balance | High hardness and wear resistance; lower toughness | Similar peak hardness but improved toughness and through-hardening |
| Cost | Lower | Higher |
Recommendation: - Choose Cr12 if you need a cost-effective, highly wear-resistant cold-work tool steel for abrasive sliding wear, fine-edge cutting, or applications where impact loading is limited and welding is to be avoided. - Choose Cr12MoV if the application involves interrupted cutting, higher impact or shock loads, larger section sizes where through-hardening is important, or when you require a better balance of toughness without sacrificing significant surface hardness—accepting a higher material cost and the need for more careful heat treatment and welding procedures.
Final practical note: always verify supplier mill certificates for chemistry and heat treatment practice, perform trial heat treatments and service testing for critical tooling, and consult the steel producer’s datasheets to match the specific variant (e.g., exact Mo and V levels) to your application needs.