BQ vs DQ – Composition, Heat Treatment, Properties, and Applications
แบ่งปัน
Table Of Content
Table Of Content
Introduction
Engineers, procurement managers, and manufacturing planners frequently face a choice between two commonly specified cold-rolled low‑carbon steel qualities: BQ and DQ. The decision typically balances forming performance (how well the sheet will draw or stamp) against manufacturability and cost — for example, selecting a grade for high-volume blanking and simple stamping operations versus choosing a grade for severe deep‑drawing where surface appearance, elongation, and formability dominate.
At a practical level the principal distinction is functional: BQ is optimized for blanking/punching and general stamping operations where cutting edge quality and dimensional stability are important, while DQ is optimized for deep drawing and severe forming where ductility, strain uniformity and drawability (r‑value control) are critical. Because they are used in overlapping product forms (coils, sheets, strips), designers commonly compare them when specifying automotive inner panels, household appliance shells, or any part requiring either economical blanking or complex forming.
1. Standards and Designations
BQ and DQ are trade/functional designations rather than single international alloy specifications. They correspond to categories of cold‑rolled low‑carbon steels covered by national and international standards that govern chemical limits, mechanical properties, and surface quality.
- Relevant international and national standards:
- EN (European): EN 10130 (cold rolled low carbon steels for forming) — e.g., DC01, DC03, DC04 — primarily carbon steels for forming.
- JIS (Japan): JIS G3141 / SPCC, SPCD — cold‑rolled steel sheets and strips for general forming and deep drawing.
- ASTM/ASME (U.S.): ASTM A1008 — cold‑rolled, carbon steel sheet and strip; ASTM A569/A653 for coated products (zinc coatings).
- GB (China): GB/T 2518, GB/T 709 and other GB standards addressing cold‑rolled and galvanised steels; national trade designations often include "BQ" and "DQ".
- Classification: Both BQ and DQ are categories of low‑carbon cold‑rolled carbon steels (not stainless, tool, or HSLA by default). They are intended for forming applications rather than for high‑alloy corrosion resistance or high‑temperature service.
2. Chemical Composition and Alloying Strategy
The functional differences between BQ and DQ arise primarily from microalloying and process control rather than large differences in bulk alloy additions. Typical compositional control focuses on keeping carbon and residuals low and controlling elements that affect bake hardening, grain size, and planar anisotropy.
| Element | BQ (blanking / general stamping) | DQ (deep drawing / severe forming) |
|---|---|---|
| C (Carbon) | Low — controlled to maintain adequate strength and surface cut quality | Very low — kept lower than BQ to improve ductility and reduce tendency to fracture in drawing |
| Mn (Manganese) | Controlled (strength + deoxidation) | Controlled, sometimes lower than BQ to limit strength and enhance formability |
| Si (Silicon) | Trace to moderate (deoxidation) | Low to moderate |
| P (Phosphorus) | Minimized (embrittlement and surface defects) | Strictly minimized for drawability |
| S (Sulfur) | Low; controlled for machinability/blanking (may be slightly higher if improved cuttability is desired) | Very low; sulfide control to avoid brittle inclusions during drawing |
| Cr, Ni, Mo (alloying) | Not typical in standard BQ | Typically not added; deep‑drawing steels achieve properties through processing rather than heavy alloying |
| V, Nb, Ti (microalloying) | Occasionally used for grain‑size control or strength | Occasionally used in controlled amounts to stabilize grain without hurting formability |
| B, N | Trace; nitrogen often controlled | Nitrogen controlled (limits on interstitials improve ductility) |
How alloying affects performance: - Lower carbon and tighter control of residuals (P, S, N) improve uniform elongation and reduce the risk of cracking during deep drawing. - Microalloying and very small additions (Nb, Ti, V) can pin grain boundaries and improve strength without large losses in ductility when properly thermomechanically processed. - BQ grades may tolerate slightly higher C or S if the priority is clean shear and edge quality during blanking; DQ prioritizes interstitial control and planar anisotropy.
3. Microstructure and Heat Treatment Response
Both BQ and DQ are produced as cold‑rolled, often batch‑annealed or continuously annealed products. Their as‑delivered microstructure is typically a fine ferrite matrix with low amounts of pearlite and controlled precipitates; the difference lies in grain size, texture, and inclusion control.
- BQ microstructure:
- Fine ferritic matrix, engineered for uniform shear properties and clean cut edges after blanking.
- Annealing cycles aim for stable mechanical properties and acceptable surface condition for painting or coating.
- DQ microstructure:
- Even finer, more homogeneous ferrite with optimized crystallographic texture (planar anisotropy control) to raise average r‑value and drawability.
- Continuous annealing with controlled cooling to achieve low yield strength and high uniform elongation; sometimes skin‑pass or light temper rolling to adjust surface and tension.
Heat treatment and processing routes: - Normalizing/annealing: Both grades are annealed to soften the material after cold rolling. DQ often receives tighter control of anneal temperature and atmosphere to minimize interstitial pickup and produce a more favorable texture. - Quenching & tempering: Not applicable for these low‑carbon cold‑rolled drawing steels; they are not heat‑treated to create martensite. - Thermo‑mechanical processing: DQ benefits most from controlled rolling and annealing sequences that refine grain and tune texture for higher r‑value and deep‑draw performance.
4. Mechanical Properties
Typical functional distinctions in mechanical behavior are qualitative — BQ trades some ductility for higher edge quality and dimensional stability, while DQ emphasizes ductility and formability.
| Property | BQ | DQ |
|---|---|---|
| Tensile Strength | Moderate — suitable for general stamped parts | Moderate to slightly lower — optimized for elongation |
| Yield Strength | Moderate — provides good dimensional control during blanking | Lower — reduces springback and eases drawing |
| Elongation (%) | Good, but lower than DQ in severe forming | Higher — improved uniform elongation and total elongation |
| Impact Toughness | Adequate for service; presence of inclusions controlled | Typically comparable or superior for formability purposes |
| Hardness | Moderate surface hardness for improved blanking edge | Slightly lower to enhance ductility and reduce crack propensity |
Why the difference: - Lower yield and higher elongation in DQ come from reduced interstitial content (C, N), finer grain control and optimized texture; this allows metal to undergo larger plastic strains before necking or cracking. - BQ achieves better performance in processes that cut or shear the material by tolerating slightly higher strength and different inclusion characteristics.
5. Weldability
Weldability of low‑carbon cold‑rolled steels is generally good, but differences matter where welding is followed by forming or painting.
Weldability indices such as the IIW Carbon Equivalent can be used to assess susceptibility to hydrogen cracking and the need for preheat:
$$CE_{IIW} = C + \frac{Mn}{6} + \frac{Cr+Mo+V}{5} + \frac{Ni+Cu}{15}$$
A related parameter for steels with microalloying is the Pcm:
$$P_{cm} = C + \frac{Si}{30} + \frac{Mn+Cu}{20} + \frac{Cr+Mo+V}{10} + \frac{Ni}{40} + \frac{Nb}{50} + \frac{Ti}{30} + \frac{B}{1000}$$
Interpretation (qualitative): - Both BQ and DQ are low in alloy content and usually have low $CE_{IIW}$ and $P_{cm}$ scores, indicating good general weldability with conventional fusion processes. - DQ’s lower carbon and stricter interstitial control make it marginally more forgiving in terms of cold cracking after welding, especially when subsequent forming occurs. - For critical applications or heavy gauge materials, preheat, controlled heat input and post‑weld thermal practice should be chosen based on the combined effect of composition and part geometry rather than the grade name alone.
6. Corrosion and Surface Protection
BQ and DQ are not stainless steels; corrosion resistance depends on surface treatment and coatings rather than composition.
- Common protections: galvanizing (hot‑dip or electro), electroplating, organic coatings (paint, powder), conversion coatings, and passivation prior to painting.
- When stainless steels are not in scope, PREN is not applicable. For reference, the PREN index for stainless steels is:
$$\text{PREN} = \text{Cr} + 3.3 \times \text{Mo} + 16 \times \text{N}$$
- Recommendation: Specify coating system and pre‑treatment for service environment (e.g., hot‑dip galvanize for outdoor exposure; phosphating and epoxy primer for indoor painted parts). DQ parts intended for inner visible surfaces may require higher surface finish and tighter control of coating adhesion.
7. Fabrication, Machinability, and Formability
Forming: - DQ is superior for deep drawing, complex stretch forming, and operations requiring high uniform elongation. It exhibits better resistance to local thinning and earing when texture and r‑value are controlled. - BQ is well suited to blanking, punching, moderate stamping and parts where a clean shear edge and dimensional repeatability are priorities.
Machinability: - Both are similar for secondary machining; machinability generally increases with higher sulfur (which BQ may tolerate slightly more of), but that can hurt drawability. - For high precision trimming and secondary operations, BQ’s edge quality after blanking can reduce secondary finishing costs.
Surface finishing: - DQ typically receives tighter surface control in annealing and cold reduction to ensure consistent paintability and reduce the risk of surface defects after deep drawing.
8. Typical Applications
| BQ (Blanking/General Stamping) | DQ (Deep Drawing/Severe Forming) |
|---|---|
| Automotive exterior trim, brackets, clips (where blanking quality and dimensional control are important) | Automotive inner panels, fuel tank components, complex drawn housings |
| Metal furniture components, simple stamped enclosures | Appliance shells (washing machine drums, refrigerator inner liners) requiring deep draws |
| Parts where economical blanking and stamping predominate | Complex cups, pans, and parts requiring high elongation and minimal wrinkling |
Selection rationale: - Choose BQ where cost, edge quality, and blanking productivity are decisive. - Choose DQ where large, seamless draws, surface appearance after forming, and resistance to through‑thickness fracture govern part performance.
9. Cost and Availability
- Relative cost: DQ is typically priced higher than generic BQ because of tighter compositional control, additional processing (controlled annealing, texture control) and higher quality assurance on surface and mechanical properties.
- Availability by product form: Both are commonly available in coils, sheet, and strip. DQ may be more commonly stocked for automotive and appliance industries and thus available in specific temper/anneal conditions; BQ is widely available as a general commercial cold‑rolled grade.
- Procurement tip: Specify material condition (annealed, skin‑passed, coated) and critical performance metrics (r‑value, yield, elongation, surface finish) rather than relying solely on the grade name to ensure supply and price clarity.
10. Summary and Recommendation
| Aspect | BQ | DQ |
|---|---|---|
| Weldability | Good (typical low‑carbon) | Slightly better in terms of post‑weld formability due to lower interstitials |
| Strength–Toughness | Moderate strength, good edge behavior | Slightly lower yield, higher ductility and uniform elongation |
| Cost | Lower (general commercial grade) | Higher (tight process and surface control) |
Conclusion and recommendations: - Choose BQ if your priority is economical blanking and general stamping where edge quality, dimensional stability and throughput are the main drivers. BQ is suitable for parts that do not require severe forming and where cutting performance and reduced surface finish requirements are acceptable. - Choose DQ if your priority is deep drawing, complex forming, high uniform elongation, and surface condition after forming. DQ is the right choice for components that will undergo large plastic strains without wrinkling or cracking and where superior formability outweighs incremental material cost.
Final procurement advice: specify the required mechanical properties, surface finish, and process route (continuous anneal vs batch anneal, coating requirements) rather than relying solely on the label “BQ” or “DQ.” Where formability or surface appearance is critical, require material test reports showing r‑value/anisotropy data and annealing parameters to ensure repeatable performance on the production line.