4Cr13 vs 9Cr18 – Composition, Heat Treatment, Properties, and Applications
แบ่งปัน
Table Of Content
Table Of Content
Introduction
4Cr13 and 9Cr18 are two widely used martensitic stainless steel grades in Chinese and international practice. Engineers and procurement professionals commonly face a selection dilemma between them: balancing wear resistance and edge-holding (high-carbon, high-chromium steels) against cost, toughness, and ease of fabrication (lower-carbon martensitics). Typical decision contexts include knife and tooling components, valve and pump parts, wear components for industrial equipment, and applications where controlled corrosion resistance is required with hardened surfaces.
The principal technical difference is that 9Cr18 is a higher-carbon, higher-chromium martensitic stainless steel optimized for hardness and wear resistance, while 4Cr13 is a lower-carbon martensitic stainless steel that trades some wear resistance for improved toughness, weldability, and lower material cost. These characteristics drive the common comparison in design and manufacturing, particularly where surface wear, edge retention, and moderate corrosion resistance are in conflict with forming, joining, and impact requirements.
1. Standards and Designations
- Common standards and equivalents referenced in international trade and engineering documentation:
- GB/T (China): 4Cr13, 9Cr18 (Chinese grade designations)
- JIS/AISI/SAE: 4Cr13 is often considered similar to AISI 420/420J2 family; 9Cr18 is often compared to AISI 440C/9Cr (high-carbon martensitic stainless) in function though exact compositions differ by standard.
- EN/ASTM: No direct one-to-one EN or ASTM name fits perfectly; equivalence is typically handled by matching chemical and mechanical requirements rather than exact designation.
- Classification:
- 4Cr13: Martensitic stainless steel (stainless tool/structural martensitic)
- 9Cr18: High-carbon martensitic stainless steel (stainless tool/wear-resistant martensitic)
2. Chemical Composition and Alloying Strategy
The following table shows typical nominal composition ranges used in specification sheets and supplier data for these grades. Values are indicative and will vary by exact standard or supplier; check the purchase specification for contract-sensitive limits.
| Element | Typical range — 4Cr13 (nominal) | Typical range — 9Cr18 (nominal) |
|---|---|---|
| C | 0.30–0.45 wt% | 0.80–1.05 wt% |
| Mn | ≤ 1.0–1.2 wt% | ≤ 1.0 wt% |
| Si | ≤ 1.0 wt% | ≤ 1.0 wt% |
| P | ≤ 0.03–0.04 wt% | ≤ 0.03–0.04 wt% |
| S | ≤ 0.03 wt% | ≤ 0.03 wt% |
| Cr | 12–14 wt% | 17–19 wt% |
| Ni | typically trace | typically trace |
| Mo | usually trace/none | typically trace/none |
| V, Nb, Ti, B, N | generally not intentionally alloyed; small residuals possible | generally not intentionally alloyed; small residuals possible |
Alloying strategy and effects: - Carbon: Primary hardenability and martensite-forming element. Higher carbon in 9Cr18 increases achievable hardness, wear resistance, and carbide volume fraction; it also increases susceptibility to brittle behavior and weld cracking without careful control. - Chromium: Provides corrosion resistance and contributes to hardenability. 9Cr18’s higher chromium content improves general corrosion resistance relative to 4Cr13 and supports formation of harder chromium-rich carbides, enhancing wear resistance. - Manganese and silicon: Deoxidizers and austenite stabilizers in small amounts; higher Mn increases hardenability modestly. - Impurity elements (P, S): Kept low to preserve toughness and avoid embrittlement; S may be intentionally increased slightly in free-machining variants, but typical 4Cr13/9Cr18 are not high-sulfide types.
3. Microstructure and Heat Treatment Response
Typical microstructures for both grades are martensitic after appropriate austenitizing and quenching, but the carbide distribution and matrix carbon content differ substantially.
- 4Cr13:
- After solution treatment and quenching, a predominantly martensitic matrix with relatively low retained carbide volume. Carbides are generally smaller and more dispersed because of the lower carbon content.
- Tempering reduces brittleness and produces tempered martensite; achievable hardness is moderate and can be tailored for a balance of toughness and strength.
-
Normalizing provides a more uniform structure for subsequent machining or finishing.
-
9Cr18:
- After austenitizing and quenching, martensite with a higher fraction of chromium carbides (M23C6 and other Cr-rich carbides) is typical because of high carbon and high chromium. Carbide networks or larger particles increase wear resistance but reduce toughness.
- Tempering reduces internal stresses and adjusts hardness but over-tempering may soften carbides and reduce wear resistance.
- Achieving optimal properties requires tighter control of austenitizing temperature and time to control carbide dissolution and distribution.
Processing effects: - Normalizing/refining grain size is useful for both grades before final heat treatment. - Quenching media, section thickness, and austenitizing temperature strongly influence retained austenite and hardness—particularly critical in 9Cr18 due to high hardenability. - Cryogenic treatments are sometimes used in high-carbon martensitic stainless steels (like 9Cr18 analogues) to reduce retained austenite and stabilize hardness.
4. Mechanical Properties
Reported mechanical properties depend heavily on heat treatment, tempering temperature, and product form. The following table gives indicative ranges for commonly specified heat-treated conditions (quenched and tempered). Values are illustrative; specify exact post-heat-treatment property requirements in procurement documents.
| Property | 4Cr13 — typical (quenched & tempered) | 9Cr18 — typical (quenched & tempered) |
|---|---|---|
| Tensile strength (MPa) | ~600–1200 MPa (condition-dependent) | ~800–1600 MPa (condition-dependent) |
| Yield strength (0.2% offset, MPa) | ~400–900 MPa | ~600–1400 MPa |
| Elongation (%) | ~8–20% | ~5–15% |
| Impact toughness (J, notched) | Moderate; higher than 9Cr18 for comparable hardness | Lower, particularly at high hardness levels |
| Hardness (HRC) | ~40–56 HRC (depending on temper) | ~55–64 HRC (higher achievable hardness) |
Interpretation: - Strength and hardness: 9Cr18 can be hardened to higher hardness and tensile levels because of its higher carbon and abrasive chromium carbides; it is therefore superior for wear-critical components. - Toughness and ductility: 4Cr13 typically provides better toughness and elongation at a given hardness level due to lower carbon and lower carbide content. - The trade-off is classic: 9Cr18 favors wear/edge retention; 4Cr13 favors toughness and easier post-processing.
5. Weldability
Weldability is governed by carbon equivalent and alloy content that promote hardenability and martensite formation in the heat-affected zone (HAZ). Two commonly used predictive expressions are:
$$CE_{IIW} = C + \frac{Mn}{6} + \frac{Cr+Mo+V}{5} + \frac{Ni+Cu}{15}$$
and
$$P_{cm} = C + \frac{Si}{30} + \frac{Mn+Cu}{20} + \frac{Cr+Mo+V}{10} + \frac{Ni}{40} + \frac{Nb}{50} + \frac{Ti}{30} + \frac{B}{1000}$$
Qualitative interpretation: - 9Cr18’s high carbon and elevated chromium yield a higher carbon equivalent and $P_{cm}$, indicating a higher propensity for cold cracking, a hard martensitic HAZ, and the need for preheat, controlled interpass temperature, and post-weld heat treatment to temper HAZ martensite. - 4Cr13, with lower carbon, typically exhibits lower CE and better weldability; however, it is still a martensitic stainless steel and may require preheat and tempering after welding in thicker sections to avoid HAZ cracking. Use of low-hydrogen electrodes and controlled heat input is advisable for both grades.
6. Corrosion and Surface Protection
- Both 4Cr13 and 9Cr18 are classified as martensitic stainless steels and obtain their corrosion resistance primarily from chromium content. They are not as corrosion-resistant as austenitic stainless steels (e.g., 304/316) or duplex grades in chloride-rich or highly oxidizing environments.
- PREN (Pitting Resistance Equivalent Number) is often used to compare localized corrosion resistance:
$$\text{PREN} = \text{Cr} + 3.3 \times \text{Mo} + 16 \times \text{N}$$
- For these grades, Mo and N are typically absent or low, so PREN is driven primarily by Cr. 9Cr18’s higher chromium nominally yields a higher PREN than 4Cr13, implying somewhat better pitting resistance in neutral to mildly corrosive environments. However, neither grade is designed for severe marine or chloride service without surface protection.
- When corrosion resistance is insufficient, conventional surface protection applies:
- Passivation (nitric or citric acid) to restore passive film after machining.
- Coatings such as electroplating or PVD for sliding/wear surfaces, or protective paints, where appropriate.
- Galvanizing is generally not applied to stainless substrates for corrosion improvement and may not bond well; surface finishing and passivation are preferred.
7. Fabrication, Machinability, and Formability
- Machinability:
- 4Cr13 generally machines more easily than 9Cr18 because of lower hardness in annealed/normalized conditions and lower carbide content. Free-machining variants may be available, but standard 4Cr13 is not a free-machining alloy.
- 9Cr18, with higher carbon and hard carbides, increases tool wear and may require carbide tooling, slower feeds, and controlled chip formation strategies.
- Formability:
- Both are martensitic stainless steels and have limited cold formability in hardened conditions. Forming is easiest in annealed or normalized conditions prior to final quench and tempering.
- Surface finishing:
- Polishing and grinding are common for both; 9Cr18 often requires more aggressive abrasives and tool life considerations.
8. Typical Applications
| 4Cr13 — Common uses | 9Cr18 — Common uses |
|---|---|
| Knife blades where good toughness and reasonable corrosion resistance are required (lower cost blades, utility knives) | Knife blades and cutlery requiring higher edge retention and wear resistance (premium edge-holding blades) |
| Valve components, pump shafts, and hardware requiring moderate corrosion resistance with good toughness | Bearing components and wear parts where high hardness and abrasion resistance are required |
| General-purpose hardened parts (couplings, small structural components) | Medical and surgical instruments (limited to certain instruments where high hardness is needed and surface passivation is applied) |
| Decorative and engineering components where post-process finishing and welding are needed | Tooling for cold work and small tooling components with high wear demands |
Selection rationale: - Choose 4Cr13 for parts that require a blend of toughness, reasonable corrosion resistance and lower cost, or where welding and forming are frequent. - Choose 9Cr18 for parts that prioritize hardness, abrasion resistance, and edge retention, accepting increased machining cost and more stringent heat-treatment/weld controls.
9. Cost and Availability
- Cost:
- 9Cr18 is typically more expensive on a per-kilogram basis than 4Cr13 because of higher chromium and carbon content and more demanding heat treatment to achieve high hardness.
- Processing costs (hardening, grinding, tooling wear) for 9Cr18 are also higher.
- Availability:
- Both grades are widely available in common product forms (bar, sheet, strip, plate, forgings), but specific sizes, surface finishes, and tight-tolerance heat-treated bar-stock may be less common for 9Cr18 and stocked more in specialist suppliers.
- For high-volume procurement, 4Cr13 variants are generally easier to source from multiple mills; 9Cr18 may require working with specialty stainless tool steel suppliers for certain product forms.
10. Summary and Recommendation
Summary table (qualitative):
| Attribute | 4Cr13 | 9Cr18 |
|---|---|---|
| Weldability | Good-to-moderate; lower risk than 9Cr18 | Moderate-to-poor; higher preheat and PWHT needs |
| Strength–Toughness balance | Moderate strength; better toughness and ductility | Higher strength and hardness; reduced toughness |
| Cost | Lower material and processing cost | Higher material and processing cost |
Recommendations: - Choose 4Cr13 if: - You need a reasonably corrosion-resistant martensitic stainless steel with improved toughness and lower total cost. - Welding, forming, or post-fabrication work is frequent or critical. - The service condition includes moderate impact loading or where catastrophic brittle failure would be unacceptable.
- Choose 9Cr18 if:
- High hardness, wear resistance, and edge retention are the primary design drivers.
- You can control heat treatment, machining processes, and welding procedures (or avoid welding by design).
- The application tolerates lower impact toughness and higher processing cost for the benefit of longer wear life or better cutting performance.
Final note: Both grades are martensitic stainless steels and their in-service performance is strongly dependent on precise composition, section thickness, and carefully controlled heat treatment. For procurement and engineering specifications, define required hardness/toughness targets, post-weld heat-treatment requirements, and corrosion expectations explicitly to ensure suppliers deliver material conditioned for the intended application.