310S vs 253MA – Composition, Heat Treatment, Properties, and Applications
แบ่งปัน
Table Of Content
Table Of Content
Introduction
Engineers, procurement managers, and manufacturing planners routinely choose between stainless alloys on the basis of corrosion resistance, high-temperature performance, weldability, and cost. 310S and 253MA are both corrosion-resistant stainless steels used in elevated-temperature environments, but they are optimized for different service envelopes: one for general high-temperature oxidation resistance with excellent ductility, the other for long-term high-temperature strength, scale resistance, and creep stability.
The principal practical difference is that 253MA is engineered to maintain protective oxide behavior and creep resistance at very high temperatures through controlled low carbon, silicon and niobium additions, whereas 310S is a high-chromium–nickel austenitic alloy optimized primarily for broad high-temperature oxidation resistance and formability. That is why designers commonly weigh 310S’s ease of fabrication and cost against 253MA’s superior long-term performance in extreme thermal-oxidizing service.
1. Standards and Designations
- 310S
- Common designations: UNS S31008, EN 1.4845 (for 310), ASTM/ASME specifications typically reference AISI/UNS. 310S is an austenitic stainless steel.
- 253MA
- Proprietary and standardized forms exist (e.g., product names from Sandvik and other suppliers). It is commonly supplied as a high-temperature austenitic stainless steel designed for oxidation and creep resistance.
- Category identification:
- 310S: Austenitic stainless steel.
- 253MA: Austenitic stainless steel alloyed for high-temperature service (stabilized/modified austenitic stainless).
Note: Exact standard numbers for 253MA can vary by manufacturer and product form; consult supplier certificates for the controlling specification.
2. Chemical Composition and Alloying Strategy
The table below shows typical composition ranges reported in public datasheets for each grade. These are typical nominal ranges for common commercial forms (annealed). Material certificates and vendor datasheets must be consulted for procurement and design calculations.
| Element | 310S (typical nominal ranges) | 253MA (typical nominal ranges) |
|---|---|---|
| C | ≤ 0.08% | ≤ 0.02% (very low) |
| Mn | ≤ 2.0% | ≤ 2.0% |
| Si | ≤ 1.5% | ~0.4–1.0% (elevated for oxide behavior) |
| P | ≤ 0.045% | ≤ 0.03% |
| S | ≤ 0.03% | ≤ 0.01% |
| Cr | 24–26% | ~21–23% |
| Ni | 19–22% | ~11–13% |
| Mo | ≤ 0.75% (typically none) | ≤ 0.5% (typically low) |
| V | trace | trace |
| Nb (Cb) | — | small addition (stabilizing; ~0.2–0.8%) |
| Ti | — | trace to small if stabilized |
| B | — | trace (if present) |
| N | ≤ 0.1% | controlled low level |
Comments on alloying strategy: - 310S uses high Cr and high Ni to stabilize the austenite and provide oxidation resistance and ductility. Its higher Ni content improves toughness and formability. - 253MA uses a lower Ni level but includes controlled Si and small Nb (columbium) stabilizer additions and very low carbon to avoid carbide precipitation and to form a stable, adherent oxide scale. These adjustments improve long-term high-temperature strength and oxidation/corrosion resistance in cyclic or aggressive atmospheres.
3. Microstructure and Heat Treatment Response
- 310S
- Typical microstructure: fully austenitic in the annealed condition. Grain size depends on fabrication and annealing. No precipitation strengthening; carbide precipitation can occur if held in sensitization range (but lower C in 310S reduces this risk).
- Heat treatment: solution anneal and fast cooling restore ductility and corrosion resistance. 310S is not hardened by quenching/tempering.
- 253MA
- Typical microstructure: austenitic matrix with controlled dispersion of stable phases (niobium-stabilized carbides/nitrides) designed to reduce matrix depletion and pin grain boundaries at high temperatures.
- Heat treatment: solution annealing is used to dissolve undesirable phases and reprecipitate controlled stabilizing phases. Thermo-mechanical processing and controlled heat treatment improve creep properties. Not responsive to hardening by quench/temper; strength improvements come from alloying and controlled precipitation.
How processing affects each: - Normalizing/annealing restores austenite and relieves stresses in both grades; 253MA’s advantages in creep and scale adherence derive from its chemistry and the stability of oxide and precipitate phases after proper heat treatment. - Quench & temper is not applicable to these austenitic grades; cold work will increase strength via strain hardening but can reduce ductility.
4. Mechanical Properties
Typical mechanical properties depend strongly on product form and heat treatment. The table shows representative values for commonly supplied annealed products; verify actual values with mill test reports.
| Property | 310S (annealed, typical) | 253MA (annealed, typical) |
|---|---|---|
| Tensile strength (UTS) | ~500–600 MPa | Generally higher at room temperature; often ~550–750 MPa |
| Yield strength (0.2% offset) | ~200–300 MPa | Typically higher than 310S; improved high-temperature yield/creep strength |
| Elongation (A%) | ~35–50% | Moderate to good; typically lower than 310S but still ductile (varies 20–45%) |
| Impact toughness (Charpy) | Good at ambient; retains toughness | Good at ambient; designed to retain toughness at elevated temperatures |
| Hardness (HB or HRB) | Relatively low (soft, ductile) | Slightly higher due to microalloying and precipitates |
Interpretation: - 253MA usually provides higher strength, especially for long-term elevated temperature loading and creep resistance, while 310S tends to be more ductile and easier to form and machine. - Impact toughness at ambient is generally acceptable for both; 253MA is engineered to preserve useful toughness after long exposures at high temperature.
5. Weldability
Weldability of both grades is good relative to many steels, but differences matter in practice.
Key influencing factors: - Carbon and nitrogen: lower carbon reduces risk of sensitization and intergranular corrosion; nitrogen can stabilize austenite. - Alloy content and stabilizers (e.g., Nb) affect hot cracking and weld thermal cycles.
Useful empirical indices: - Carbon equivalent for austenitics (IIW-type): $$CE_{IIW} = C + \frac{Mn}{6} + \frac{Cr+Mo+V}{5} + \frac{Ni+Cu}{15}$$ - Pcm index: $$P_{cm} = C + \frac{Si}{30} + \frac{Mn+Cu}{20} + \frac{Cr+Mo+V}{10} + \frac{Ni}{40} + \frac{Nb}{50} + \frac{Ti}{30} + \frac{B}{1000}$$
Qualitative interpretation: - 310S: High Ni content improves weldability and ductility of weld metal; its relatively modest carbon (in 310S) reduces sensitivity to sensitization. Preheat is generally not required for thin sections; post-weld annealing can be used to restore properties where necessary. - 253MA: Weldable but requires attention: niobium stabilization and elevated silicon may alter weld metal chemistry; very low carbon minimizes sensitization but weld filler selection is important to maintain high-temperature properties. For long-term high-temperature service, post-weld heat treatment and use of matching or approved filler metals may be required to avoid localized degradation and to preserve creep/oxidation resistance.
Always follow manufacturer welding procedures and perform qualification welds for critical components.
6. Corrosion and Surface Protection
- Non-stainless vs stainless: both 310S and 253MA are stainless (austenitic) grades; surface protection strategies differ from carbon steels.
- Oxidation and high-temperature corrosion:
- 310S: High Cr and Ni confer good high-temperature oxidation resistance up to roughly 1000–1150 °C in many environments; it forms protective Cr-oxide scales under many conditions.
- 253MA: Formulated to form a stable, adherent oxide (often Si-rich surface oxide) and to resist scale spalling and aggressive oxidation under cyclic and long-term exposures; superior for long-term use in aggressive high-temperature environments.
- Localized corrosion indices:
- Where localized corrosion resistance is assessed by PREN, use: $$\text{PREN} = \text{Cr} + 3.3 \times \text{Mo} + 16 \times \text{N}$$
- For both 310S and 253MA, Mo is low and PREN values are moderate; neither grade is intended for severe chloride pitting service compared to Mo-bearing duplex or superaustenitic alloys.
- When stainless protection is insufficient, coatings (thermal spray, aluminizing, ceramic coatings) or controlled atmospheres may be used for both grades.
7. Fabrication, Machinability, and Formability
- 310S
- Excellent formability and deep drawing characteristics due to high Ni and fully austenitic structure.
- Machinability is fair; typical stainless machining practices apply (rigid setup, sharp tooling, reduced feeds if galling occurs).
- 253MA
- Good formability but higher work-hardening and stronger matrix can require greater forming forces.
- Machining can be more demanding than 310S because of higher strength and possible hardening; tool life and speeds should be optimized for the alloy.
Surface finishing and post-fabrication treatments aimed at stress relief and oxide scale control may differ based on final application temperature and environment.
8. Typical Applications
| 310S – Typical Uses | 253MA – Typical Uses |
|---|---|
| Furnace muffles, radiant tubes, heat exchanger elements, combustion chamber liners, general heat-resisting parts | High-temperature burner components, industrial furnace fixtures, radiant tubes in aggressive atmospheres, long-life heat-treatment fixtures, components exposed to cyclic oxidation and creep |
| Chemical process equipment where high-temperature corrosion resistance and formability are required | Applications demanding long-term dimensional stability and oxide-scale adhesion under cyclic thermal loads |
Selection rationale: - Choose 310S when the application needs good high-temperature oxidation resistance combined with excellent formability and cost-effectiveness. - Choose 253MA when long-term exposure, cyclic conditions, and resistance to scale growth/spallation and creep are critical.
9. Cost and Availability
- 310S
- Widely available globally in sheet, plate, tube, and bar forms from many mills. Relative cost is moderate among high-alloy austenitics because of higher Ni content but mass production and availability reduce lead times.
- 253MA
- Typically a specialty alloy produced in more limited product forms and volumes. Unit cost is generally higher than 310S and lead times can be longer, especially for large quantities or specialized product forms.
Procurement tip: specify exact material standard, product form, and required certificates; for 253MA, allow supplier lead times and confirm available dimensions.
10. Summary and Recommendation
Summary table (qualitative):
| Attribute | 310S | 253MA |
|---|---|---|
| Weldability | Excellent (good filler options) | Good, but requires procedure control |
| Strength–Toughness | Good ductility; moderate strength | Higher long-term high-temperature strength; good toughness |
| Cost & Availability | More economical and widely available | Higher cost; specialty availability |
Conclusion — recommendations: - Choose 310S if you need a generally available, economical austenitic alloy with excellent formability and reliable high-temperature oxidation resistance for short- to medium-term service (e.g., furnace components, general heat-resistant parts), and when ease of fabrication and lower procurement complexity are priorities. - Choose 253MA if your application requires superior long-term oxidation resistance, stable oxide-scale adhesion, and creep resistance in aggressive or cyclic high-temperature environments where lifetime and dimensional stability justify higher material costs and tighter process control.
Final recommendation: specify performance requirements (operating temperature, atmosphere, expected lifetime, mechanical loads, weld/joint design) and request mill certificates or supplier data sheets. For critical elevated-temperature components, perform comparative lifecycle cost analysis: higher upfront cost for 253MA can be justified by reduced downtime, longer intervals between replacements, and better high-temperature performance.