304 vs 316 – Composition, Heat Treatment, Properties, and Applications
แบ่งปัน
Table Of Content
Table Of Content
Introduction
Stainless steels 304 and 316 are two of the most widely specified austenitic grades in industry. Engineers, procurement managers, and manufacturing planners frequently must decide between them when balancing corrosion resistance, fabrication/weldability, mechanical needs, and cost. Typical decision contexts include food processing and kitchen equipment (where cost and formability are important) versus marine or chemical service (where chloride corrosion resistance is critical).
The principal metallurgical distinction is that 316 is alloyed with molybdenum (and often has a slightly higher nickel content), which enhances resistance to localized corrosion—especially pitting and crevice attack in chloride-containing environments. Because both are austenitic stainless steels with similar base chromium and nickel contents, they are often compared for substitution or specification choices.
1. Standards and Designations
Common international standards and designations for 304 and 316 include:
- ASTM/ASME: A240/A276/A312 (plate, bar, tubing respectively)
- EN: 1.4301 (304), 1.4401 (316) and their low-carbon/stabilized variants (e.g., 1.4307 = 304L, 1.4404 = 316L)
- JIS: SUS304, SUS316
- GB (China): 0Cr18Ni9 (approx. 304), 0Cr17Ni12Mo2 (approx. 316)
Classification: both 304 and 316 are stainless (austenitic) steels. They are not carbon steels, tool steels, or HSLA grades.
2. Chemical Composition and Alloying Strategy
The following table summarizes typical compositional ranges for common commercial 304 and 316 grades (annealed, standard grades). Product standards and suppliers may specify slightly different limits; stabilized or low-carbon variants (e.g., 304L, 316L, 316Ti, 316Nb) change some entries.
| Element | 304 (typical range, wt%) | 316 (typical range, wt%) |
|---|---|---|
| C | ≤ 0.08 | ≤ 0.08 |
| Mn | ≤ 2.0 | ≤ 2.0 |
| Si | ≤ 0.75 | ≤ 0.75 |
| P | ≤ 0.045 | ≤ 0.045 |
| S | ≤ 0.03 | ≤ 0.03 |
| Cr | 17.0–19.0 | 16.0–18.0 |
| Ni | 8.0–10.5 | 10.0–14.0 |
| Mo | — (typically 0) | 2.0–3.0 |
| V | trace (not specified) | trace (not specified) |
| Nb | not present (except stabilized grades) | not present (except stabilized grades) |
| Ti | not present (except stabilized grades) | not present (except stabilized grades) |
| B | trace / not specified | trace / not specified |
| N | small, controlled (often ≤ 0.1) | small, controlled (often ≤ 0.1) |
How alloying affects performance - Chromium (Cr) provides the passive oxide film that gives stainless steel its basic corrosion resistance. - Nickel (Ni) stabilizes the face-centered-cubic (austenitic) phase, improving toughness, ductility, and low-temperature performance. - Molybdenum (Mo), present in 316, increases resistance to pitting and crevice corrosion in chloride-containing environments and improves resistance to some chemical media. - Carbon content affects strength and susceptibility to sensitization (carbide precipitation) during heating/welding; low-carbon variants (304L, 316L) or stabilized grades mitigate sensitization.
3. Microstructure and Heat Treatment Response
Microstructure - Both 304 and 316 are fully austenitic at room temperature (face-centered cubic, FCC) after standard solution annealing. - Microstructure typically consists of a single-phase austenite with possible trace amounts of delta ferrite depending on processing and composition.
Heat-treatment response and processing - Austenitic stainless steels are essentially non-heat-treatable for strengthening by quenching and tempering in the way ferritic/martensitic steels are. Mechanical properties are primarily set by cold work and work hardening. - Common thermal processes: - Solution annealing (typically around 1,050–1,100 °C followed by quenching) dissolves carbides and restores corrosion resistance and ductility. - Stress-relief annealing at lower temperatures is used selectively but can risk carbide precipitation if held in the sensitization range (~500–800 °C). - Sensitization: prolonged exposure in the 500–800 °C range causes chromium carbide precipitation at grain boundaries, depleting chromium in adjacent areas and increasing intergranular corrosion susceptibility. Mitigation: specify low-carbon grades (304L/316L) or stabilized grades (TP347/316Ti) when welding or when service involves temperatures that could cause sensitization. - Cold working increases strength through strain hardening but also increases susceptibility to localized corrosion if deformation damages the passive film.
4. Mechanical Properties
Mechanical properties depend on product form (sheet, plate, bar, wire), heat treatment, and cold work. The table gives typical annealed, commercially-available ranges; precise values must be confirmed from material certificates or standards for procurement.
| Property (annealed, typical) | 304 | 316 |
|---|---|---|
| Tensile strength (UTS) | ~480–620 MPa (typical range) | ~480–620 MPa (typical range) |
| Yield strength (0.2% offset) | ~190–310 MPa (varies by product) | ~190–310 MPa (varies by product) |
| Elongation (A%) | ≥ 40% (thin gauge higher) | ≥ 40% (thin gauge higher) |
| Impact toughness (room temp) | High; retains ductility and toughness | High; similar or slightly better at low temp |
| Hardness (annealed) | HB ~120–200 (dependent on work hardening) | HB ~120–200 (dependent on work hardening) |
Interpretation - Strength: In the annealed condition, 304 and 316 exhibit very similar tensile and yield strengths; differences in strength are typically small compared with effects from cold work or product form. - Toughness and ductility: Both grades are tough and ductile at room and sub-zero temperatures owing to stable austenitic microstructure. 316 may retain slightly better toughness in some low-temperature or highly corrosive environments due to its alloying, but differences are modest. - Hardness: Both are relatively soft in the annealed state; hardness can increase substantially with cold work.
5. Weldability
Weldability of both 304 and 316 is generally very good using standard fusion welding processes (TIG, MIG, SMAW, etc.). Key considerations:
- Carbon level and sensitization: carbon content controls susceptibility to intergranular corrosion after welding. Use low-carbon variants (304L, 316L) or stabilized grades (e.g., 316Ti) for heavy gauge weldments or when post-weld solution annealing is impractical.
- Hardness and hardenability: austenitic stainless steels have low hardenability; formation of martensite in weld HAZ is uncommon compared to ferritic steels.
- Weldability indices (qualitative): carbon equivalent formulas help evaluate cracking or hardenability risk. Example indices commonly used by engineers are: $$CE_{IIW} = C + \frac{Mn}{6} + \frac{Cr+Mo+V}{5} + \frac{Ni+Cu}{15}$$ and $$P_{cm} = C + \frac{Si}{30} + \frac{Mn+Cu}{20} + \frac{Cr+Mo+V}{10} + \frac{Ni}{40} + \frac{Nb}{50} + \frac{Ti}{30} + \frac{B}{1000}$$
- Qualitative interpretation: both 304 and 316 produce ductile, crack-resistant welds with proper procedures. 316’s Mo and higher Ni content can require attention to filler selection to match corrosion performance. Post-weld solution anneal or use of low-carbon/stabilized grades minimizes sensitization.
6. Corrosion and Surface Protection
Stainless grades - The passive Cr2O3 film on both 304 and 316 gives general corrosion resistance in air and many aqueous environments. - For localized corrosion (pitting, crevice corrosion) in chloride-containing environments, molybdenum is an effective alloying element. Use the pitting resistance equivalent number (PREN) as a comparative index: $$\text{PREN} = \text{Cr} + 3.3 \times \text{Mo} + 16 \times \text{N}$$ Qualitatively, 316 (with Mo) will have a higher PREN than 304 and thus superior pitting resistance in chloride-bearing media. - Sensitization and intergranular corrosion occur if carbon combines with chromium at grain boundaries; low-carbon or stabilized grades mitigate this.
Non-stainless steels - For carbon and low-alloy steels (not the subject of this comparison), corrosion protection methods include galvanizing, painting, polymer coatings, or cathodic protection. PREN does not apply to non-stainless metals.
7. Fabrication, Machinability, and Formability
- Formability: 304 is generally regarded as slightly easier to form and draw than 316 in the annealed condition; both are extensively used for deep drawing and complex shapes. Cold work increases strength but reduces ductility.
- Machinability: Austenitic stainless steels are more difficult to machine than carbon steels due to work hardening and toughness. 316, because of Mo and higher nickel, often machines slightly less easily than 304 and can generate rapid tool wear; use sharp tools, rigid set-ups, positive feeds, and appropriate coolant.
- Surface finishing: both take standard mechanical and electropolishing finishes. 316 is often preferred where electropolishing and passivation will be relied on in chloride environments.
- Forming and welding guidelines: avoid overheating and long holds in the 500–800 °C range to prevent sensitization; plan weld sequences and filler material selections to preserve corrosion performance.
8. Typical Applications
| 304 — Typical Uses | 316 — Typical Uses |
|---|---|
| Kitchen equipment, sinks, food processing equipment (non-chloride) | Marine hardware, pumps, valves, and fittings exposed to seawater |
| Architectural trim and indoor railings | Chemical and petrochemical equipment handling chlorides or acids |
| Beverage and dairy equipment | Pharmaceutical and medical devices where chloride resistance needed |
| Fasteners (interior use), decorative panels | Heat exchangers, condenser tubing in marine or coastal plants |
| Automotive trim and interior components | Offshore platforms, shipbuilding components, coastal infrastructure |
Selection rationale - Choose 304 when service does not involve significant chloride attack and cost and formability are priorities. - Choose 316 when service includes exposure to seawater, brines, or chloride-rich chemicals where enhanced pitting and crevice resistance is required.
9. Cost and Availability
- Cost: 316 is typically more expensive than 304 because molybdenum and often higher nickel raise material cost. Price differentials vary with market fluctuations in Ni and Mo.
- Availability: 304 is more widely stocked in a broader range of product forms (sheet, plate, bar, fasteners) and thicknesses. 316 is widely available but may have longer lead times or higher minimum order quantities for some specialty product forms (e.g., large-diameter seamless tubing or heavy plate).
- Procurement note: specify exact grade, product form, and any low-carbon or stabilized variants when ordering to avoid substitutions that could impair corrosion performance.
10. Summary and Recommendation
Summary table (qualitative)
| Aspect | 304 | 316 |
|---|---|---|
| Weldability | Excellent (use 304L or stabilization as needed) | Excellent (use 316L or stabilization as needed) |
| Strength–Toughness | Good; similar to 316 in annealed state | Good; similar to 304 in annealed state; retains toughness in corrosive environments |
| Corrosion resistance (general) | Good | Better in chloride/pitting environments due to Mo |
| Formability | Slightly better for deep drawing | Slightly less formable; better for severe corrosion service |
| Machinability | Marginally easier than 316 | Slightly more challenging; work hardens more |
| Cost | Lower | Higher (Mo and Ni content increase cost) |
Conclusions and recommendations - Choose 304 if: - The application is indoor or involves non-chloride service (food equipment, architectural finishes) where general corrosion resistance, lower cost, and good formability are the priority. - You want maximum availability across product forms and sizes at lower material cost. - Choose 316 if: - The service environment includes chlorides, seawater, brines, or chemical media that promote pitting and crevice corrosion. - Longer life in aggressive environments, reduced maintenance, or higher material reliability justifies the higher material cost. - You require improved performance in welded assemblies where localized corrosion resistance in the weld area is critical (and you select appropriate low-carbon/stabilized options as needed).
Final procurement tip: Always specify the exact grade variant (e.g., 304L, 316L, 316Ti), product form, surface finish, and any testing or certification requirements. For critical or aggressive environments, consider laboratory corrosion testing, field trials, or material qualification to validate grade selection for the intended service.