0Cr13 vs 1Cr13 – Composition, Heat Treatment, Properties, and Applications
แบ่งปัน
Table Of Content
Table Of Content
Introduction
0Cr13 and 1Cr13 are two commonly specified grades within the martensitic stainless family used across valves, pumps, cutlery, fasteners, and wear components. Engineers, procurement managers, and manufacturing planners often face a choice between the two when balancing hardness and wear resistance against toughness, weldability, and cost. Typical decision contexts include selecting a material for a corrosion-resistant shaft or selecting a valve trim material where hardness (abrasion resistance) competes with fracture toughness and ease of fabrication.
The principal practical difference between 0Cr13 and 1Cr13 is their carbon level and the way that carbon influences martensitic hardenability: the higher-carbon grade offers greater as-heat-treated hardness/strength and wear resistance at the expense of toughness and weldability, while the lower-carbon variant is more forgiving in fabrication and gives better toughness but lower maximum hardness. Because both are martensitic stainless steels with similar chromium levels, they are compared frequently in design where a balance of corrosion resistance and mechanical performance is required.
1. Standards and Designations
- GB (China): 0Cr13, 1Cr13 (common Chinese designations for martensitic stainless steels).
- JIS (Japan): analogous families include SUS410 / SUS420 series (useful for cross-reference).
- EN (Europe): martensitic stainless steels are covered by EN 10088 parts, with equivalents often in the 410 / 420 series.
- ASTM/ASME: comparable materials are found in AISI classifications (410, 420, 430 etc.); exact equivalence requires cross-referencing nominal chemistry and properties.
Classification: Both 0Cr13 and 1Cr13 are martensitic stainless steels (ferrous stainless, heat-treatable). They are not austenitic stainlesses (not duplex) nor HSLA or tool steels in a strict sense, though they are used in applications that require wear-resistant, heat-treatable stainless properties.
2. Chemical Composition and Alloying Strategy
The following table gives typical composition ranges used commercially; actual limits depend on the standard or supplier. These are approximate, intended to show the relative differences (not normative specification limits).
| Element | 0Cr13 (typical, approx.) | 1Cr13 (typical, approx.) |
|---|---|---|
| C | 0.03 – 0.08 wt% (lower carbon) | 0.08 – 0.15 wt% (higher carbon) |
| Mn | ≤ 1.0 wt% | ≤ 1.0 wt% |
| Si | ≤ 1.0 wt% | ≤ 1.0 wt% |
| P | ≤ 0.04 wt% | ≤ 0.04 wt% |
| S | ≤ 0.03 wt% | ≤ 0.03 wt% |
| Cr | 12.0 – 14.0 wt% | 12.0 – 14.0 wt% |
| Ni | ≤ 0.6 wt% | ≤ 0.6 wt% |
| Mo | ≤ 0.3 wt% (often absent) | ≤ 0.3 wt% (often absent) |
| V | trace / not specified | trace / not specified |
| Nb, Ti, B, N | trace levels if present | trace levels if present |
How alloying affects performance: - Carbon: primary hardening element for martensitic steels. Higher C increases maximum achievable hardness and wear resistance but reduces toughness and weldability. - Chromium (≈12–14%): supplies corrosion resistance by forming a passive oxide layer; at these levels provides basic “stainless” behavior in mild environments but less pitting resistance than higher-alloy stainlesses. - Manganese and silicon: deoxidizers and influence hardenability modestly. - Low Ni and Mo: typically minimal in these grades; absence of Mo limits pitting resistance and high-temperature corrosion resistance.
3. Microstructure and Heat Treatment Response
Microstructure: - Both grades form martensite when quenched from the austenitizing temperature, given their composition and heat treatment route. - In the as-annealed condition they may show ferrite/pearlitic remnants depending on cooling, but for intended service they are typically hardened to martensite + tempered martensite.
Heat treatment responses: - Austenitizing (typical for martensitic stainless): solution treat at an appropriate temperature to form a homogeneous austenite, then quench to obtain martensite. - Tempering: reduces brittleness, improves toughness, and sets final hardness. Tempering at higher temperatures lowers hardness and raises ductility. - Normalizing vs quenching: Normalizing may be used on less critical parts to refine grain size; full quench + temper is used when higher strength or wear resistance is needed.
Relative response: - 1Cr13 (higher C) achieves a higher as-quenched hardness and can be tempered to a higher retained hardness range; it is more sensitive to tempering temperature when tuning strength vs toughness. - 0Cr13 (lower C) develops martensite with lower hardness for the same heat treatment, and is less likely to form brittle martensitic structures that require very careful tempering—this improves toughness and reduces the risk of cracking during quench/temper cycles.
Thermo-mechanical processing: - Forging and controlled rolling followed by proper heat treatment can refine microstructure and improve toughness in either grade; however, higher-carbon 1Cr13 remains more hardenable and therefore more sensitive to section thickness and cooling rate.
4. Mechanical Properties
Mechanical properties depend strongly on heat treatment. Rather than absolute values (which vary with tempering), the table below compares relative tendencies for typical quenched-and-tempered conditions used in industry.
| Property | 0Cr13 | 1Cr13 |
|---|---|---|
| Tensile Strength | Moderate | Higher |
| Yield Strength | Moderate | Higher |
| Elongation (ductility) | Higher (more ductile) | Lower (less ductile) |
| Impact Toughness | Better (higher toughness) | Lower (reduced toughness at equivalent hardness) |
| Hardness (after quench/temper) | Moderate maximum | Higher maximum achievable |
Explanation: - 1Cr13, with increased carbon, permits higher strength and hardness after quenching and tempering; that makes it preferable where wear resistance is critical. - 0Cr13 offers better toughness and ductility for the same nominal processing because lower carbon reduces the propensity for brittle martensite and retained stresses. - Selecting a heat-treatment and tempering regimen can trade off hardness for toughness in either grade; 1Cr13 gives a wider hardness envelope but requires more careful heat treatment to avoid embrittlement.
5. Weldability
Weldability of martensitic stainless steels is dominated by carbon content, overall hardenability, and the presence of elements that broaden the austenite region.
Key carbon-equivalent formulas useful for qualitative assessment: - Carbon equivalent (IIW): $$CE_{IIW} = C + \frac{Mn}{6} + \frac{Cr+Mo+V}{5} + \frac{Ni+Cu}{15}$$ - Pcm formula: $$P_{cm} = C + \frac{Si}{30} + \frac{Mn+Cu}{20} + \frac{Cr+Mo+V}{10} + \frac{Ni}{40} + \frac{Nb}{50} + \frac{Ti}{30} + \frac{B}{1000}$$
Interpretation (qualitative): - Because 1Cr13 has the higher carbon content, it yields a higher $CE_{IIW}$ and $P_{cm}$ relative to 0Cr13, increasing the propensity for cold cracking, martensite formation in the heat-affected zone (HAZ), and hydrogen-assisted cracking. - 0Cr13, with lower carbon, is easier to weld using conventional filler metals and preheat/post-weld heat treatment (PWHT) protocols, and requires less aggressive preheat. Practical guidance: - Preheat and PWHT are commonly required for both grades when welding thicker sections or critical assemblies. For 1Cr13, higher preheat and controlled interpass temperatures and more rigorous PWHT reduce HAZ hardness and the risk of cracking. - Choice of filler metal: use compatible martensitic or austenitic-ferritic filler depending on desired properties; austenitic fillers can minimize HAZ cracking risk but will change corrosion and mechanical behavior locally.
6. Corrosion and Surface Protection
Both 0Cr13 and 1Cr13 are stainless because they contain chromium in the ~12–14% range, which supports formation of a passive film in many atmospheres. However, their corrosion resistance is moderate and significantly lower than that of higher-alloy stainlesses (e.g., 304/316).
- General corrosion: adequate in mildly corrosive environments (air, water) but not recommended for chloride-rich or pitting environments without protective measures.
- Pitting and crevice resistance: limited—Mo content is usually low or absent; therefore the common pitting resistance equivalent number (PREN) is low and less applicable for these grades.
Useful corrosion index (when applicable): $$\text{PREN} = \text{Cr} + 3.3 \times \text{Mo} + 16 \times \text{N}$$ - For 0Cr13 and 1Cr13, with negligible Mo and N, PREN is driven mainly by chromium and will be modest compared with duplex or austenitic stainlesses.
Surface protection for non-severe environments: - Galvanizing: uncommon on stainless steels; can be used on low-cost carbon steels instead. - Painting, plating: common for additional corrosion protection where aesthetics and protection are required. - Passivation: chemical passivation (nitric or citric acid) can restore/optimize the passive layer after fabrication.
Clarification: PREN is meaningful for stainless grades with appreciable Mo and N; for these martensitic grades PREN merely underlines their limited pitting resistance.
7. Fabrication, Machinability, and Formability
- Machinability: Higher-carbon 1Cr13 is generally harder and thus more difficult to machine in the as-quenched condition. Machinability is better in the annealed or lower-hardness temper range. 0Cr13 is easier to machine when similar heat-treated hardness is required.
- Grinding and finishing: 1Cr13's higher hardness makes abrasive finishing more challenging and increases tooling wear; 0Cr13 is more forgiving.
- Formability and bending: Lower-carbon 0Cr13 has better formability and springback characteristics in the softened (annealed) condition. Martensitic stainless steels, in general, are not as formable as austenitic grades.
- Surface finish and etching: Both steels respond to common stainless finishing; however, post-weld grinding and passivation are often required to restore corrosion resistance after fabrication.
8. Typical Applications
| 0Cr13 (lower carbon) | 1Cr13 (higher carbon) |
|---|---|
| Valve bodies and trims where improved toughness and weldability are prioritized | Wear-resistant components such as knife blades, cutting edges, and shafts requiring higher hardness |
| Shafts, fasteners, pump components in moderately corrosive service with routine PWHT | Ball bearing cages, valve seats, and seal rings where hardness/wear resistance is critical |
| General-purpose structural stainless parts where fabrication ease matters | Tools, wear plates, and components subjected to abrasive wear where higher hardness is needed |
Selection rationale: - Use 0Cr13 when weldability, toughness, and ductility are more critical than peak hardness; it is preferred for components with dynamic loads and where post-weld performance is important. - Use 1Cr13 when maximum achievable hardness and wear resistance are the key drivers and where careful heat treatment and welding controls are acceptable.
9. Cost and Availability
- Cost: 1Cr13 and 0Cr13 are generally similar in base-material cost because chromium content dominates alloy price. 1Cr13 can be slightly cheaper per unit processing cost if finished hardness reduces finishing operations, but additional welding and heat treatment controls can increase overall part cost.
- Availability: Both grades are widely produced and available in plate, bar, and forged forms in regions manufacturing to GB and equivalent specifications. Specific product forms, tight composition controls, or specialized heat-treatment states may affect lead times.
10. Summary and Recommendation
Summary table (qualitative)
| Characteristic | 0Cr13 | 1Cr13 |
|---|---|---|
| Weldability | Good (better than 1Cr13) | Fair to Poor (requires stricter preheat & PWHT) |
| Strength–Toughness trade-off | Balanced toward toughness | Balanced toward higher strength/hardness |
| Cost (material only) | Comparable | Comparable |
Conclusion — choose based on application needs: - Choose 0Cr13 if you need improved weldability, higher toughness, and better ductility for components subject to dynamic loading or where fabrication simplicity is important. - Choose 1Cr13 if you require higher as-heat-treated hardness and wear resistance and can apply strict heat-treatment and welding controls to manage brittleness and HAZ cracking risk.
Final notes for specification and procurement: - Always request the supplier’s certified chemical analysis and heat-treatment condition; specify required mechanical properties and heat-treatment/tempering regime on purchase orders. - For welded assemblies, provide welding procedure specifications (WPS) detailing preheat, interpass control, consumables, and PWHT requirements, and consider NDT/inspections where failure consequences are significant.